Hi guys!
My connection-level input filter needs to replace a request with
another request. This "another
request" is contained, in encrypted form, in the BODY of the POST
request I'm going to replace.
I've been able to use ap_save_brigade, and move all the request's
bucket brigades to a ctx
bucke
hi guys !
i have a problem, I want to add some http header to the request data via the
filter,
but I find a http header data will be insert to a bucket brigade not to a
bucket, so
I can't add the http header, for example Content-Length. so if I want to add
the
Content-Length to the request data, I
On 10/15/07, jk jk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Sorry, 1 server under which all developers run a separate copy of the app
> using their own URI.
I think you have your answer then: run a separate server for each
developer. That's what I consider the "normal" way to do it, and it's
easy. You don't
On Oct 15, 2007, at 1:47 PM, Graham TerMarsch wrote:
On Sunday 14 October 2007 2:58 pm, Boysenberry Payne wrote:
I just tried putting the Javascript minifier onto our production
server since it was working so well on my local development
server, and
I noticed an incredible slow down.
I was
Sorry, 1 server under which all developers run a separate copy of the app
using their own URI. Thanks. --JK
On 10/15/07, Perrin Harkins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On 10/15/07, jk jk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On our test server, each developer has his own checkout and his own
> URI. To
>
On 10/15/07, jk jk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On our test server, each developer has his own checkout and his own URI. To
> eliminate the need to constantly restart the server, we installed
> Apache2::Reload. Unfortunately, we use a custom @ISA for each developer's
> copy, which Apache2::Reload
Recently we transitioned a rather large webapp from vanilla CGI to MP2.
On our test server, each developer has his own checkout and his own URI. To
eliminate the need to constantly restart the server, we installed
Apache2::Reload. Unfortunately, we use a custom @ISA for each developer's
copy, wh
On Sunday 14 October 2007 2:58 pm, Boysenberry Payne wrote:
> I just tried putting the Javascript minifier onto our production
> server since it was working so well on my local development server, and
> I noticed an incredible slow down.
>
> I was wondering if you had a change to look.
I'd be happ
Hi,
I am running a perl email sending engine ( which delivers 50K+ emails
per hour )
Anyways this system is made up of various daemons connecting to each other.
Well my problem is that we have a client connecting to a server to
retrieve emails ( 50K every hour ).
Well my problem is happenin
