Hi,
I'm not sure what you mean by "processing", I assume it's some sort of
filtering of the HTTP data flow. What _I_ do is use mod_proxy in
reverse-proxy configuration :
browser --> reverseproxy --> backend-web-server
On the reverse-proxy, I use mod_proxy and mod_perl, plus sometimes
output filt
On Wed, 06 Sep 2006 16:42:29 -0700, Philip M. Gollucci wrote
> > Summary of my perl5 (revision 5.0 version 8 subversion 1) configuration:
> > Platform:
> > osname=linux, osvers=2.6.0-test3, archname=i586-linux-thread-multi
> > uname='linux oldwotan 2.6.0-test3 #1 smp tue may 20 08:20:31 u
On Sep 6, 2006, at 18:14, Geoffrey Young wrote:
yeah, that's what $r->push_handlers() does... or ought to do :)
but since you're asking yet know the answer, I'm assuming you've
found a
bug?
No, it just makes sense to me, but is not documented that way any
place that I can find…
Thanks,
Geoffrey Young wrote:
> David Wheeler wrote:
>> Hi All,
>>
>> Is it possible to install a request phase handler (via push_handler()
>> or some other method) during a request that will only execute in that
>> request, and be removed as a handler after the request completes?
>
> yeah, that's what
David Wheeler wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> Is it possible to install a request phase handler (via push_handler()
> or some other method) during a request that will only execute in that
> request, and be removed as a handler after the request completes?
yeah, that's what $r->push_handlers() does... or o
Hi All,
Is it possible to install a request phase handler (via push_handler()
or some other method) during a request that will only execute in that
request, and be removed as a handler after the request completes?
Many TIA,
David
Philip M. Gollucci wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> After some deep thought, here's whats going to happen:
all sounds good
+1
--Geoff
> Summary of my perl5 (revision 5.0 version 8 subversion 1) configuration:
> Platform:
> osname=linux, osvers=2.6.0-test3, archname=i586-linux-thread-multi
> uname='linux oldwotan 2.6.0-test3 #1 smp tue may 20 08:20:31 utc 2003 i686
> i686 i386 gnulinux '
First guess, upgrade your perl to
-- Forwarded Message ---
From: "Greger" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thu, 7 Sep 2006 02:32:36 +0300
Subject: test suite fails, mp2.02, apache 2.2.3
-8<-- Start Bug Report 8<--
1. Problem Description:
[DESCRIBE THE PROBL
On Wed, 6 Sep 2006 19:09:15 -0400
Jonathan Vanasco <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sep 6, 2006, at 6:41 PM, Frank Wiles wrote:
>
> >Is that 500MB that "vanished" in used, buffers, or cached? Just
> >because it isn't listed in "free" doesn't mean it isn't "free"
> > from a "Available memo
On Sep 6, 2006, at 6:41 PM, Frank Wiles wrote:
Is that 500MB that "vanished" in used, buffers, or cached? Just
because it isn't listed in "free" doesn't mean it isn't "free" from
a "Available memory I can use" standpoint. For example, your
system
will reclaim memory from cached
After all that dust settles,
mp1.30 will be RM'ed by either me or Phillippe and released which will include
the integration of Apache-SizeLimit.
--
Philip M. Gollucci ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) 323.219.4708
Consultant / http://p6
Hi all,
After some deep thought, here's whats going to happen:
svn trunk:
Apache-SizeLimit integration is going to be rolled back to
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/perl/modperl/tags/before_apache_sizelimit_integration
This tag is then going to be deleted.
I'll then start the Release process
On Wed, 6 Sep 2006 18:26:46 -0400
Jonathan Vanasco <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Sep 6, 2006, at 6:01 PM, Frank Wiles wrote:
>
> >It didn't disappear, and it isn't "shared" like the type of
> > sharing we talk about with mod_perl/Apache. It's not CoW sharing.
> I know.
>
> >The shar
On Sep 6, 2006, at 6:01 PM, Frank Wiles wrote:
It didn't disappear, and it isn't "shared" like the type of sharing
we talk about with mod_perl/Apache. It's not CoW sharing.
I know.
The shared memory you're talking about here is held by the
postmaster
daemon and is used to store
On Wed, 6 Sep 2006 17:36:50 -0400
Jonathan Vanasco <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> From what I can tell, this is happening:
> bootup: ( pg ) 861 Free
> apache start: ( apache , pg , 3x pg clients ) 785 Free
> apache stop:( pg, 3x pg clients ) 840 Free
> apache start:
On Aug 18, 2006, at 6:24 AM, Andreas Rieke wrote:
Hi,
after booting a redhat enterprise linux 3 machine with apache 2.0.58,
perl 5.8.8 and mod_perl 2.0.2,
it runs well using about 300 M of 1 G physical RAM.
However, the remaining RAM decreases day by day, and after 2 or 3
weeks, the machine cra
On Wed, 06 Sep 2006 14:02:56 -0400
Perrin Harkins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> You can usually increase your performance greatly just by tuning your
> existing SQL and database. Run Apache::DProf or the DBI profiler,
> find out where the time is being spent, and work on it. There are
> many reso
On Wednesday 06 September 2006 16:26, Sumit Shah wrote:
> Charles,
>
> Thanks for the information. I will surely take a look at mod_proxy in
> detail. I believe I would still need to use mod_perl to invoke the perl
> script I have to do the processing.
>
> So if I understand, I could use mod_proxy
Charles,
Thanks for the information. I will surely take a look at mod_proxy in
detail. I believe I would still need to use mod_perl to invoke the perl
script I have to do the processing.
So if I understand, I could use mod_proxy and mod_perl in conjunction
with each other. MOD_PROXY would provid
On Sep 6, 2006, at 2:02 PM, Perrin Harkins wrote:
That probably means you are limited by the database, like everyone
else.
right. i'm just wondering what the avg numbers for moderate logic
apps are.
I like httperf for benchmarks.
its ok. it and ab haven't been updated in a while thou
You can usually increase your performance greatly just by tuning your
existing SQL and database. Run Apache::DProf or the DBI profiler, find
out where the time is being spent, and work on it. There are many
resources for database performance tuning. Work on the actual queries
and schema structu
On Wed, 2006-09-06 at 13:46 -0400, Jonathan Vanasco wrote:
> with 2 children running, I'm handling ~70 r/s @ concurrency 10-1000
> 4-8 children seems to be my point for diminishing marginal utility-
> in that range, I'm handling ~100 r/s @ concurrency 10-1000 ; and the
> numbers don
after talking with some people off list, I've got a question about
performance under mod perl, for actual applications
mp shows amazing performance marks with hello world, but few of us
need to serve 1100 'hello worlds'
personally, i'm seeing this:
processor: p4 2.4
os:
Hi,
chapter 7 of http://www.oreilly.com/catalog/wrapmod/ has something, but
it is outdated.
If I understand your need correctly, you could use the normal mod_proxy
module and filter your input and/or output using Apache 2 filters.
I us this to make the wildest things, including fixing non-proxy-
On Wednesday 06 September 2006 07:36, Beheer wrote:
> On Tue, 2006-09-05 at 09:25 -0300, Adriano Ferreira wrote:
> > The issue is: does apache2 reports the segmentation fault with
> > Carp::confess? If this is not the case, that's why you don't see the
> > stack trace information.
>
> Yes, it does
> Why do you keep saying "Carp::Confess"? Do you mean "Carp::confess", right?
You are right. I mean (and use in the code) "Carp::confess".
On 9/6/06, Beheer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Tue, 2006-09-05 at 09:25 -0300, Adriano Ferreira wrote:
> The issue is: does apache2 reports the segmentation fault with
> Carp::confess? If this is not the case, that's why you don't see the
> stack trace information.
Yes, it does use Carp::Confe
On Tue, 2006-09-05 at 09:25 -0300, Adriano Ferreira wrote:
> The issue is: does apache2 reports the segmentation fault with
> Carp::confess? If this is not the case, that's why you don't see the
> stack trace information.
Yes, it does use Carp::Confess but stops confessing at the point where
Carp
> andy law (RI) wrote:
> > Well, they don't because there is the whole issue of the
> location of
> > the libaprutil.so library which was Darryl's problem (and
> one that I
> > share too). Is that fixed as well in the next release?
> Thread link please ?
msg11128 et seq. I found it at
http:
andy law (RI) wrote:
> Well, they don't because there is the whole issue of the location of the
> libaprutil.so library which was Darryl's problem (and one that I share
> too). Is that fixed as well in the next release?
Thread link please ?
--
-
> Yes, both status. and content_length_header.t are fixed in
> SVN and will be fixed in the 2.0.3 release.
Hurrah!
>
>
> > I also understand from trawling through the mailing list
> archives - a > not entirely pain-free procedure itself -
> that the mod_perl 'grown-ups'
> > are "getting
32 matches
Mail list logo
