On Tue, 2006-08-15 at 19:48 -0400, Jesse Erlbaum wrote:
> It seems to be the framework of choice, nowadays, for Perl-based server
> page systems (i.e., PHP, JSP, ASP -- any system which puts code in
> pages). By the look of it, Mason seems like it has more life than
> EmbPerl. Is that correct? A
I feel that Mason is too much tied into the Mason approach. I didn't
think it was as extensible or easy to override as some other options.
I'm running my own MVC framework, but if Catalyst were stable when I
started work, I would have chosen it.
Personally, I only use TAL for view componen
Hi Joel --
> It's a big and fairly powerful templates-on-steroids system. I have
> ideological objections to the mixing of code and HTML
You'll get no argument from me in the separation of code from HTML
department! I've not been active on the mod_perl list in the last year,
but do a search in
On 15-Aug-06, at 4:25 PM, Arshavir Grigorian wrote:
I guess I was more interested in type of structures that continuously
increase the memory footprint with each request (memory leaks).
I've had moderate success with Devel::GC::Helper [*].
It's not mod_perl integrated, but easy enough to add
On Tue, Aug 15, 2006 at 07:48:26PM -0400, Jesse Erlbaum wrote:
> Hi All --
>
> Question for the group, at the very distinct risk of starting a holy
> war:
>
> What is the general opinion of HTML::Mason?
It's a big and fairly powerful templates-on-steroids system. I have
ideological objections
Hi All --
Question for the group, at the very distinct risk of starting a holy
war:
What is the general opinion of HTML::Mason?
It seems to be the framework of choice, nowadays, for Perl-based server
page systems (i.e., PHP, JSP, ASP -- any system which puts code in
pages). By the look of it,
On Aug 15, 2006, at 4:54 PM, Leo Lapworth wrote:
Just as a reference I run a big site which has processes which
start at about 30 MBs
but over tens of thousands of request do grow, I decided it was
better to spend the time
doing more coding than days of tracking down small memory leaks
(goo
On 15 Aug 2006, at 21:28, Perrin Harkins wrote:
On Tue, 2006-08-15 at 16:20 -0400, Jonathan Vanasco wrote:
My children are pegged at 6-13MB of private memory, on top of
80mb ?!? of parent memory
That doesn't sound very big to me.
Really?
Yeah, that's really not surprising. And you can sti
On Tue, 2006-08-15 at 13:25 -0700, Arshavir Grigorian wrote:
> I guess I was more interested in type of structures that continuously
> increase the memory footprint with each request (memory leaks).
> Barring a database table getting larger, etc, is there any reason why
> the memory footprint shoul
On Tue, 2006-08-15 at 16:20 -0400, Jonathan Vanasco wrote:
> >> My children are pegged at 6-13MB of private memory, on top of
> >> 80mb ?!? of parent memory
> > That doesn't sound very big to me.
> Really?
Yeah, that's really not surprising. And you can still run a lot of
those on a 1GB machine.
On 8/15/06, Perrin Harkins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Tue, 2006-08-15 at 12:49 -0700, Arshavir Grigorian wrote:
> What would be a good tool for finding where this type of a problem
> problem is?
Memory growth? You basically comment out code until it stops happening.
> Also, considering tha
On Aug 15, 2006, at 3:43 PM, Perrin Harkins wrote:
Linux::Smaps, if you're on Linux.
f*&(. FreeBSD.
i'll dig up a debian box.
My children are pegged at 6-13MB of private memory, on top of
80mb ?!? of parent memory
That doesn't sound very big to me.
Really?
I was under impression that wi
On Tue, 2006-08-15 at 12:49 -0700, Arshavir Grigorian wrote:
> What would be a good tool for finding where this type of a problem
> problem is?
Memory growth? You basically comment out code until it stops happening.
> Also, considering that Perl does automagic garbage
> collection, what sort of
On 8/15/06, Perrin Harkins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Tue, 2006-08-15 at 15:24 -0400, Jonathan Vanasco wrote:
> Does anyone know if there's something in httpd / mod_perl that will
> let me dump and analyze the memory in the child (and possibly the
> parent)?
Linux::Smaps, if you're on Linux.
On Tue, 2006-08-15 at 15:24 -0400, Jonathan Vanasco wrote:
> Does anyone know if there's something in httpd / mod_perl that will
> let me dump and analyze the memory in the child (and possibly the
> parent)?
Linux::Smaps, if you're on Linux.
> My children are pegged at 6-13MB of private memor
Does anyone know if there's something in httpd / mod_perl that will
let me dump and analyze the memory in the child (and possibly the
parent)?
My children are pegged at 6-13MB of private memory, on top of
80mb ?!? of parent memory
I'm trying to figure out what in the hell isn't sharing, o
16 matches
Mail list logo
