Re: [RELEASE CANDIDATE] libapreq2 2.08-RC5

2006-08-08 Thread Philip M. Gollucci
Joe Schaefer wrote: > "Philip M. Gollucci" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > >> Please download, test, and VOTE on the following >> candidate tarball: >> >> http://people.apache.org/~pgollucci/apreq2/libapreq2-2.08-RC5.tar.gz > > +1, tested on Debian amd64 and FreeBSD 6.1. WOOT! Thats 3 +1s from PM

Re: [RELEASE CANDIDATE] libapreq2 2.08-RC5

2006-08-08 Thread Joe Schaefer
"Philip M. Gollucci" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Please download, test, and VOTE on the following > candidate tarball: > > http://people.apache.org/~pgollucci/apreq2/libapreq2-2.08-RC5.tar.gz +1, tested on Debian amd64 and FreeBSD 6.1. -- Joe Schaefer

Re: MaxClients and Apache::DBI ?

2006-08-08 Thread Jonathan Vanasco
On Aug 8, 2006, at 1:46 PM, Perrin Harkins wrote: Meaning what? That the args don't match what you use elsewhere? You were already assuming the sessions would use their own handle, so I don't see how it matters. Based on this documentation: tie %hash, 'Apache::Session::Postgres', $id, {

Re: MaxClients and Apache::DBI ?

2006-08-08 Thread Perrin Harkins
On Tue, 2006-08-08 at 13:26 -0400, Jonathan Vanasco wrote: > I"m not sure what I see. I see ton of openings and closings Don't hit it with your site benchmark. Load 1 page and see if it opens two handles or more. You can set it to only run one process and try hitting that multiple times to see

Re: MaxClients and Apache::DBI ?

2006-08-08 Thread Jonathan Vanasco
On Aug 8, 2006, at 4:16 AM, Philip M. Gollucci wrote: I Assume you are you're using Apache::Session::Postgres, Yes I assume your passing DBH => $dbh, and LockDBH => $dbh, No locking in pg On Aug 8, 2006, at 10:36 AM, Perrin Harkins wrote: This usually means that your connection parameters

Re: svn commit: r429556 - in /perl/Apache-SizeLimit/trunk/t: apache/check_n_requests.t apache/check_n_requests2.t response/TestApache/check_n_requests.pm response/TestApache/check_n_requests2.pm

2006-08-08 Thread Geoffrey Young
Philip M. Gollucci wrote: > Geoffrey Young wrote: > >>> I realize this is "devish" but I wanted the larger audience for testing. >>> >>> I'd appreciate a sanity check from other members of our community. >>> If it looks good, I think we can >>> roll 0.92-RC1 and then 0.92 RELEASE and save the mp1

Re: svn commit: r429556 - in /perl/Apache-SizeLimit/trunk/t: apache/check_n_requests.t apache/check_n_requests2.t response/TestApache/check_n_requests.pm response/TestApache/check_n_requests2.pm

2006-08-08 Thread Philip M. Gollucci
Geoffrey Young wrote: I realize this is "devish" but I wanted the larger audience for testing. I'd appreciate a sanity check from other members of our community. If it looks good, I think we can roll 0.92-RC1 and then 0.92 RELEASE and save the mp1/mp2 split for 0.93. sounds reasonable - the

Re: MaxClients and Apache::DBI ?

2006-08-08 Thread Jonathan Vanasco
On Aug 8, 2006, at 4:16 AM, Philip M. Gollucci wrote: That says start 5 servers, I must have least 5 idle and no more then 10 idle. You can simultaneously serve 75 clients. which means i can have an 85 server max? I Assume you are you're using Apache::Session::Postgres, I assume your passi

Re: debugging advice

2006-08-08 Thread Perrin Harkins
On Mon, 2006-08-07 at 12:36 -0400, Jonathan Vanasco wrote: > does anyone have any pointers for this? I *think* that if i do all > the sets in a BEGIN block it should work the way I expect. Since the constant thing is kind of a hack and depends on prototypes, it is easy to break. The only way t

Re: MaxClients and Apache::DBI ?

2006-08-08 Thread Perrin Harkins
On Tue, 2006-08-08 at 01:16 -0700, Philip M. Gollucci wrote: > If you have Apache(2)::Reload on, you'll blow the Apache::DBI handle > cache Really? Why would it reload Apache::DBI? - Perrin

Re: MaxClients and Apache::DBI ?

2006-08-08 Thread Perrin Harkins
On Tue, 2006-08-08 at 03:52 -0400, Jonathan wrote: > for whatever reason, i seem to be creating 99 session and 99 read/ > write handles > > anyone have a clue? This usually means that your connection parameters are not always identical, or that you loaded Apache::DBI too late. Set $Apache::DBI:

Re: Rewriting "Location:" in an "ErrorDocument 302" not working. Ideas?

2006-08-08 Thread Geoffrey Young
Matt Hahnfeld wrote: > We need to rewrite redirects coming back from Apache2 mod_proxied sites > (specifically, change http urls to https urls). We already have > ProxyErrorOverride turned on for our proxied pages (and we need it for > other things), so we decided that using an "ErrorDocument 302"

Re: svn commit: r429556 - in /perl/Apache-SizeLimit/trunk/t: apache/check_n_requests.t apache/check_n_requests2.t response/TestApache/check_n_requests.pm response/TestApache/check_n_requests2.pm

2006-08-08 Thread Geoffrey Young
> I realize this is "devish" but I wanted the larger audience for testing. > > I'd appreciate a sanity check from other members of our community. If it > looks good, I think we can > roll 0.92-RC1 and then 0.92 RELEASE and save the mp1/mp2 split for 0.93. sounds reasonable - the API is current

Re: MaxClients and Apache::DBI ?

2006-08-08 Thread Philip M. Gollucci
Jonathan wrote: > I'm running prefork as such: > > StartServers 5 > MinSpareServers 5 > MaxSpareServers 10 > MaxClients75 That says start 5 servers, I must have least 5 idle and no more then 10 idle. You can simultaneously serve 75 clients. > Using ab, I benched a page th

MaxClients and Apache::DBI ?

2006-08-08 Thread Jonathan
I'm running prefork as such: StartServers 5 MinSpareServers 5 MaxSpareServers 10 MaxClients75 MaxRequestsPerChild 1 Using ab, I benched a page that has 3 db handles: session read write session has 1 connection of its own. read/write are c