On Tue, 23 May 2006, Steve Hay wrote:
Philip M. Gollucci wrote:> Please download, test, and report back on the
following> candidate tarball:> >
http://people.apache.org/~pgollucci/apreq2/libapreq2-2.08-RC2.tar.gz
All OK for me now on WinXP (Apache/2.2.2, Perl/5.8.8, mod_perl/SVN), except
for t
Jie Gao <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> Any issue with this combination? For I am getting:
Yes, there are. Me and at least 3 friends have run into it now. What
you need to do, is compile mod_perl 2.0.2 against apache 2.2.0, then upgrade
apache and leave your old mod_perl in place
Hi All,
Any issue with this combination? For I am getting:
make test
t/apache/content_length_header..ok 16/27# Failed test 17 in
t/apache/content_length_header.t at
line 71 fail #2
t/apache/content_length_header..FAILED test 17
Failed 1/27 tests, 96.30% okay
t/api/statu
I am running a dual processor PowerPC and have had mod_perl
running for almost two years with no problems.
One of the applications that I have been running is WebGUI (content
management system). When I upgraded to
the most recent version of WebGUI it had me install a bunch of Perl package
Meant to cross-post this to the list.
--
Philip M. Gollucci ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) 323.219.4708
Consultant / http://p6m7g8.net/Resume/resume.shtml
Senior Software Engineer - TicketMaster - http://ticketmaster.com
1024D/A79997FA
Hi,
I've recently set up an apache 2.0.55 server on
windows running mod_perl 2.0.2
The setup seemed quite straightforward and I'm
now trying to following tutorials to get to grips with mod_perl.
I have it set up so that the main cg-bin directory
just runs generic perl.
And u
Philip M. Gollucci wrote:
Please download, test, and report back on the following
candidate tarball:
http://people.apache.org/~pgollucci/apreq2/libapreq2-2.08-RC2.tar.gz
All OK for me now on WinXP (Apache/2.2.2, Perl/5.8.8, mod_perl/SVN),
except for the previously noted failures in t/apreq/
>>> I think we're ready from some +/-1s :)
>>
>> Although it doesn't affect me since I don't develop on Mac OS X, I'd
>> still like to see you include the simple CFLAGS fix for "make test"
>> for Mac OS X, for what it's worth.
>
> Can you be more specific as to what you are talking about ?
Jonatha
