Shailesh Garg wrote:
1. Even when the client cancels the download in between, log shows
status code as 200.
2. For range downloads, multiple 206 enteries are logged and one 200
entry, even if the download is cancel in between.
You'd probably have better luck on the users \@/ httpd (dot) apach
On Thu, 2006-04-27 at 00:10 +0200, Lionel MARTIN wrote:
> I can't understand how it could change using a startup.pl file? After all,
> doing a PerlRequire startup.pl is just a way to incoporate code in the main
> flow, isn't it?
Historically, we have sometimes had bugs with this that caused
Perl
- Original Message -
From: "Lionel MARTIN" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Perrin Harkins" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc:
Sent: Wednesday, April 26, 2006 4:10 PM
Subject: Re: How many people use the Windows combo of Apache2 + mod_perl2 ?
Hi,
I'm replying below.
On Wed, 2006-04-26 at 17:20 +02
Hi,
I'm replying below.
On Wed, 2006-04-26 at 17:20 +0200, Lionel MARTIN wrote:
I'm preloading this module, using "PerlModule MyLoadingModule" in
httpd.conf.
Does that change if you load them via "use MyLoadingModule" in a
startup.pl?
I can't understand how it could change using a startup.p
I am looking for a way to find the number of successfully downloads for a particular file. I have noticed 2 issues :-
1. Even when the client cancels the download in between, log shows status code as 200.
2. For range downloads, multiple 206 enteries are logged and one 200 entry, even if the d
On Wed, 2006-04-26 at 20:15 +0200, Tom Schindl wrote:
> In my thinking you only have to teach DBD::* to use mod_dbd/apr_dbd to
> fetch the database connection instead of opening one itself.
These typically use the C libraries provided by database vendors. I
doubt most of them support a feature li
On 4/26/06 2:15 PM, "Tom Schindl" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Joachim Zobel wrote:
>> On Tue, 18 Apr 2006 08:17:47 +0200
>> Tom Schindl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>>
>>> The better approach seems to me using mod_dbd which has the draw back
>>> that it is only available on apache-2.2 at le
Joachim Zobel wrote:
> On Tue, 18 Apr 2006 08:17:47 +0200
> Tom Schindl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>>The better approach seems to me using mod_dbd which has the draw back
>>that it is only available on apache-2.2 at least for mysql it looks
>>like it's not rocket science to get it working.
>
On Wed, 2006-04-26 at 17:20 +0200, Lionel MARTIN wrote:
> I'm preloading this module, using "PerlModule MyLoadingModule" in
> httpd.conf.
Does that change if you load them via "use MyLoadingModule" in a
startup.pl?
> I really would like to understand how the WinNT MPM is working, how memory
> i
On Tue, 18 Apr 2006 08:17:47 +0200
Tom Schindl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The better approach seems to me using mod_dbd which has the draw back
> that it is only available on apache-2.2 at least for mysql it looks
> like it's not rocket science to get it working.
AFAIK this has not yet been DBI
Hi,
modules, that are loaded 4 times in all.
You might we watching each Interpreter thread start, IIRC they start in
sequence and not simultaneously. At any rate, thats a feature of the
winnt mpm.
Unless I'm missing a point, I'm not convinced by that.
Indeed, I made further tests, and no ma
A long time back (year 2000 I think) I tried ActivePerl 5.6 with PerlEx.
It was terrible. We reverted to the Velocigen accelerator instead, and
that was good. But I'm not sure where Velocigen is now.
My gut feel for PerlEx now...better not try.
Issac Goldstand wrote:
IIRC, PerlEx was disconti
IIRC, PerlEx was discontinued a few years ago, I think shortly after the
Sophos acquisition. I've recently seen it quietly reappear in standard
ActivePerl distributions, but not sure where (if anywhere) the great
folks at ActiveState are going with it...
Issac
Philip M. Gollucci wrote:
> Foo J
modules, that are loaded 4 times in all.
You might we watching each Interpreter thread start, IIRC they start in
sequence and not simultaneously. At any rate, thats a feature of the
winnt mpm.
Moreover, I'm not sure how efficient is the Winnt MPM, related to Perl.
As you know, under Windows,
Foo Ji-Haw wrote:
Just want to do a quick poll here.
Most of the comments I read here, come from people who use the Linux/
BSD platform. Is there anybody who actually deploy the Windows combo on
a production server? For those who do, do you have any issues that are
Windows-specific?
For me
Hi,
I'm having the same kind of interrogation.
Concerning me, I'm working on a project that's still in development, and I'm
developing under Windows (MP2, ActivePerl 5.8.8 Build 816 , Apache 2.055)
I'll have to make a choice for the production environment, and I'm not sure
what to choose. I'll h
16 matches
Mail list logo
