Excellent lateral solution! Thanks Tyler.
Tyler MacDonald wrote:
Foo Ji-Haw <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
The basis for the need is because I am thinking of having my process
call itself (but another uri) to activate another process.
Appreciate any tips you can offer. Thanks.
A
Foo Ji-Haw <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The basis for the need is because I am thinking of having my process
> call itself (but another uri) to activate another process.
>
> Appreciate any tips you can offer. Thanks.
According to the docs a PerlCleanupHandler may do the trick:
http://pe
Hi all,
I'm wondering if modperl can do the following:
When responding to a http post/get, it will send a simple response to
the client, close the connection, but continue to do some processing.
Pseudo-code is as follows:
sub handler
{
my $r = shift;
print "OK";
$r->flush;
$r->cl
Versions:
Apache/2.0.54
mod_perl/2.0.1
Where can I verify:
PERL_CHILD_INIT=1
PERL_STACKED_HANDLERS=1
Are these callbacks defaulting in mod_perl 2?
(Using Apache2::Status, I don't see current values.)
How can these be verified without Apache2::Status?
Thanks All,
Bill
On Wed, 2006-03-08 at 22:43 +0200, Octavian Rasnita wrote:
> Ok, but if I will do this, it will overwrite the old mod_perl because I want
> to use it with the same Apache version. Or is it possible to specify
> the --prefix and use the full path including the name of the mod_perl file
> that will b
From: "Richard Kelsch" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Is it possible to have 2 versions of perl that use mod_perl and
libapreq?
>
> Yes. You just need to tell your new perl what path to live in when you
> build it. I think the option is named "PREFIX." Same for apache, and
> make sure you use the righ
On Tue, 2006-03-07 at 14:16 -0500, Perrin Harkins wrote:
On Tue, 2006-03-07 at 11:53 +0200, Octavian Rasnita wrote:
> Is it possible to have 2 versions of perl that use mod_perl and libapreq?
Yes. You just need to tell your new perl what path to live in when you
build it. I think the opti
On Tue, 2006-03-07 at 21:05 -0800, Will Fould wrote:
> we have a tool that loads a huge store of data (25-50Mb+) from a
> database into many perl hashes at start up: each session needs
> access to all these data but it would be prohibitive to use mysql or
> another databases for multiple, large lo
This email is to announce the new Apache2::POST200:
http://search.cpan.org/~opi/Apache2-POST200-0.03/lib/Apache2/POST200.pod
The module implements an output filter that intercepts replies with HTTP code
200 to request using the POST method. It turns them into redirects (HTTP code
302) saving the
This email is to announce the new Apache2::Translation:
http://search.cpan.org/~opi/Apache2-Translation-0.08/lib/Apache2/Translation.pod
Apache2::Translation can be looked at in 2 ways:
1) it is similar to mod_rewrite in that it lives mostly in the uri translation
phase where it can change/route
how big are these data structures?
200k? 2mb? 20mb?
if they're not too big, you could just use memcached.
http://danga.com:80/memcached/
http://search.cpan.org/~bradfitz/Cache-Memcached-1.15/Memcached.pm
its ridiculously painless to implement. i found it easier that a lot
11 matches
Mail list logo
