What I did was
install perl 5.8.7 in /usr/local/bin
mv /usr/bin /usr/bin/perl5.8.0
ln -s /usr/local/bin/perl usr/bin/perl
add /usr/local/bin to $PATH in your .bash_profile if not already. reboot the
server. Then install Apache/modperl
Hope this helps.
Harry
- Original Message -
Fro
Hi there --
I ran the Makefile.PL script using the command /usr/local/bin/perl. Once the
compilation and install was completed, I tried running the server and
unfortunately the same error message concerning Perl 5.8.0 appeared on-screen.
-Original Message-
From: Frank Wiles [mailto:[EMAI
On Mon, 27 Feb 2006 16:20:51 -0500
"Kaplan, Andrew H." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I need to recompile mod_perl to use the 5.8.8 libraries. One idea I
> had was uninstalling perl 5.8.0 completely from the system. Does
> anyone have insights into this? Thanks.
I believe it uses the Perl that wa
My longtime-redhat-user two cents:
Don't touch the system perl (5.8.0). RPM probably won't let
you.
It seems you're headed in the right direction. Just keep
moving.
Get the apache and mod_perl sources and recompile into
/usr/local.
You may want to uninstall your RPM packages for apache an
Hi there –
I am going through the motions of recompiling mod_perl on a
Red Hat Enterprise 3 server. The server was originally configured with Perl
5.8.0, but the application
which I am trying to install requires Perl 5.8.3 or later. I
downloaded the source code for version 5.8.8 and in
Well, I seem to have answered my own question:
$Location{"/$svn_location/$name/tags"} = {
LimitExcept => {
"GET PROPFIND OPTIONS REPORT COPY" => {
deny => "from all",
}
}
};
-Original Message-
From: Ed Wittmann
Sent: Monday, February 27, 2006 1:59 PM
To: modpe
Hi Enno
Funnily enough I'm doing the exact same thing ... I thought I already had a lot of perl modules, but this beats everything.
I know it's a bit of an apples and oranges thing, but can anyone give
an idea of the size of mod_perl processes that are actually using
catalyst? I currently run
Hi there -
I'm using mod_perl right now for handling my Subversion repository
permissions, and it's working (mostly) great!
I'm trying to add a LimitExcept directive so that I can keep developers
from committing to tags (basically, they get to create a tag, then they're
done) but I can't get mod_
Todd Cranston-Cuebas wrote:
> Very cool. R-on-R has something similar to this called "locomotive" for OS
> X. Really makes a try-before-you-buy scenario reasonable. I'm thrilled that
> this exists for catalyst since I very much concerned that perl needs a boost
> from such a framework and if there
Very cool. R-on-R has something similar to this called "locomotive" for OS
X. Really makes a try-before-you-buy scenario reasonable. I'm thrilled that
this exists for catalyst since I very much concerned that perl needs a boost
from such a framework and if there are huge stumbling blocks to testing
Harry Zhu wrote:
> I'm very much interested.
>
> Harry.
>
>
>
> - Original Message - From: "Enno" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "Frank Wiles" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Cc: "Leo Lapworth" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;
>
> Sent: Monday, February 27, 2006 10:46 AM
> Subject: Re: [OT]
I'm very much interested.
Harry.
- Original Message -
From: "Enno" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Frank Wiles" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: "Leo Lapworth" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;
Sent: Monday, February 27, 2006 10:46 AM
Subject: Re: [OT] modperl vs. Ruby
Just starting to
Just starting to look at Catalyst, cause we have to rewrite a lot of
stuff here. So far I'm just installing and the incredible amount of
dependencies there are, are scaring the hell out of me (think huge
processes).
It looks like its including an immense load of pure perl modules for
functionality
13 matches
Mail list logo
