Are you sure mod_deflate isn't one of your active Apache filters? mod_deflate
will not output until its buffer is full, $| notwithstanding. I tore my hair
out trying to work around it, and ended up writing my own compression filter.
But if you don't need compression, try disabling mod_deflate
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
pradeep kumar wrote:
> Can you please elaborate on why apache filters can be an issue with the
> autoflush problem that I noticed ?
>
> Also, I noticed that the autoflush work properly when I flush it to a
> regular file. Its only when I choose STDOUT
When I apachectl stop it breaks the httpd debug freeze and outputs the
following:
Carp::CODE(0x18f6968)(/opt/local/lib/perl5/5.8.7/Carp/Heavy.pm:122):
122: return @_ if ref($_[0]); # don't break references as
exceptions
DB<3>
Carp::CODE(0x18f6968)(/opt/local/lib/perl5/5.8.7/Carp/Heavy.p
When I get to the following line the debugger hangs:
my $apr = APR::Request::Apache2->handle( $r );
In the following situation:
use Apache2::RequestRec ();
use Apache2::RequestIO ();
use Apache2::Const -compile => qw(OK REDIRECT);
use strict;
use diagnostics;
use APR::Pool ();
use Apache::DB (
On Mon, 19 Sep 2005 18:50:40 -0500
Boysenberry Payne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm getting the following error:
> [Mon Sep 19 18:45:48 2005] [notice] child pid 29371 exit signal Bus
> error (10)
>
> How do I go about troubleshooting this in MP2. I'm just switching to
> it and finally
> afte
I'm getting the following error:
[Mon Sep 19 18:45:48 2005] [notice] child pid 29371 exit signal Bus
error (10)
How do I go about troubleshooting this in MP2. I'm just switching to
it and finally
after 3 days got libapreq installed, yeah... Is there a new and
improved way to debug
or anythi
On Tue, 20 Sep 2005 10:13:39 +1200
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hi
>
> I've set up mod_perl v1.29 with apache 1.3.33 and I'm trying to
> maximise the amount of memory shared between the httpd processes.
>
> I've created a startup.pl file and have entered all modules I use, and
>
> have loaded t
Hi
I've set up mod_perl v1.29 with apache 1.3.33 and I'm trying to maximise the amount of memory shared between the httpd processes.
I've created a startup.pl file and have entered all modules I use, and have loaded the specific the DB driver etc. I'm not using CGI, and only one custom module
On Mon, 2005-09-19 at 13:09 -0700, Bill Whillers wrote:
> So at what point (1k, 10k, 100k) might the overhead of a decompress on a
> frozen chunk make real sense?
You have to benchmark it yourself with your own data and network to see.
- Perrin
Aliet Santiesteban Sifontes wrote:
Windows 2003 Enterprise Server, ActivePerl 5.8.7 Build 813,
Apache-2.0.54. Perl with modules:
8. DBI[1.48]
good.
Active Perl ships with cgi-3.10, U updated to 3.11 as mod_perl says.
good.
in includes.pl
use lib qw(D:/Apache2/htdocs/i
Hi list, I'm in the process of migrating our CGI applications to
mod_perl, we are using:
Windows 2003 Enterprise Server, ActivePerl 5.8.7 Build 813,
Apache-2.0.54. Perl with modules:
1. ActivePerl-DocTools [0.5]
2. Archive-Tar[1.23]
3. Archive-Zip[1.14]
4. CGI
Thanks Perrin,
> Compression (using zlib) tends to speed things up a bit.
So at what point (1k, 10k, 100k) might the overhead of a decompress on a
frozen chunk make real sense? -- If we compressed every frozen 1k item
(requiring decompress everytime), might this only add unnecessary overhead?
On Mon, 2005-09-19 at 12:02 -0700, Bill Whillers wrote:
> From what I've learned (mostly from the generous people on this list), our
> local mysql, Storable and other usages does a great job at meeting those
> needs. In reality, the ideal case would be if our data were non-changing and
> could
> Why wrap the stored object in a database?
Thanks Matthew -- Our data is somewhat volatile but since our frozen objects
can get pretty big, like others we're always looking for an all-around better
"shared" solution for volatile data which is required during almost every
session.
From what I'
On Monday 19 September 2005 12:59 pm, Geoffrey Young wrote:
> > t/response/Something/00foo.pm
> >
> > requires the NNfoo.pm to be lower case.
> > 00foo.pm works
> > 00Foo.pm does not.
> yeah, IIRC I mention in those slides somewhere that the t/response
> voodoo is case sensitive.
You d
Philip M. Gollucci wrote:
Malcolm J Harwood wrote:
http://people.apache.org/~geoff/Apache-Test-skeleton-mp2.tar.gz
THIS PACKAGE IS FOR mod_perl 2.0 (1.99_XX) ONLY!
a mod_perl 1.0 package is available from
http://perl.apache.org/~geoff/
You may want to update that slightly as I think RC5
missing piece:
t/response/Something/00foo.pm
requires the NNfoo.pm to be lower case.
00foo.pm works
00Foo.pm does not.
yeah, IIRC I mention in those slides somewhere that the t/response
voodoo is case sensitive. I know I try to remember to emphasize that
when I talk about it...
Malcolm J Harwood wrote:
http://people.apache.org/~geoff/Apache-Test-skeleton-mp2.tar.gz
THIS PACKAGE IS FOR mod_perl 2.0 (1.99_XX) ONLY!
a mod_perl 1.0 package is available from
http://perl.apache.org/~geoff/
You may want to update that slightly as I think RC5 was the only 1.99_XX (22)
rele
On Monday 19 September 2005 07:39 am, Geoffrey Young wrote:
> > however "make test" (or "t/TEST") fails because it can't find
> > TestStartup/00startup.pm as it's only got "t/" in the path, not
> > "t/response".
> >
> > What did I miss?
>
> are you using TestRunPerl in your Makefile.PL?
Yes.
> t
I've gotten a bit behind in my list responses; however, don't think I've
forgotten you.
I owe the following threads some responses hopefully tonightish:
Re: [mp2] Directive changes the command name
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Re: Mod_Perl2 w/mod_proxy/mod_rewrite
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Re: Sth I don't u
> however "make test" (or "t/TEST") fails because it can't find
> TestStartup/00startup.pm as it's only got "t/" in the path, not "t/response".
>
> What did I miss?
are you using TestRunPerl in your Makefile.PL?
try starting with this skeleton
http://people.apache.org/~geoff/Apache-Test-ske
I should have had "sanity check" in my subject -- This was exactly the
problem.. my first asumption a couple hours ago was 2^24 ... not 16 -- (wrong
table) -- Grief!!
Thanks _alot_ guys.
On Sunday 18 September 2005 22:45, you wrote:
> Bill,
>
> It might be a MySQL limitation:
>
> http://dev
Bill,
It might be a MySQL limitation:
http://dev.mysql.com/doc/mysql/en/storage-requirements.html
If you're using a BLOB column type, you're limited to 2^16 bytes, which is
the barrier you're hitting. Try a MEDIUMBLOB column and see if that
helps.
--pete
On Sun, 18 Sep 2005, Bil
23 matches
Mail list logo
