RE: Eagle book RandPicture.pm, $r->internal_redirect, and IE 6.0 showing same image every time

2005-07-05 Thread David Christensen
Michael Peters wrote: > no_cache() should work (or at least it has for me in the past when IE > has given me similar headaches). > That's odd. no_cache should not be sending the 'Expires' header. > Instead it uses the more forceful 'Pragma: no-cache' and > 'Cache-control: no-cache'. These are not

RE: Eagle book RandPicture.pm, $r->internal_redirect, and IE 6.0 showing same image every time

2005-07-05 Thread David Christensen
Frank Maas wrote: > You conclude somehwere that IE is not honouring the Expires header, > but that need not be completely true. The only thing that header is > telling IE is that it may not _unconditionally_ reuse the same data > the next time it is needed. And most probably IE complies to it. > S

Re: Problems with DBI & modperl on Irix 6.5

2005-07-05 Thread Perrin Harkins
On Tue, 2005-07-05 at 11:05 -0400, Robert Aspinall wrote: > Yes, DBI is installed and up to date, as is Apache::DBI. Usually when it works from command-line and not from mod_perl, it means one of these: - mod_perl and DBI were not compiled with the same C compiler. - There is a permissions probl

[Fwd: Re: Apache2 namespace]

2005-07-05 Thread Philip M. Gollucci
Original Message Subject:Re: Apache2 namespace Date: Tue, 5 Jul 2005 08:45:58 -0400 From: Kevin A. McGrail <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Philip M. Gollucci <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED

Re: Apache2 namespace

2005-07-05 Thread Jim Albert
Philip M. Gollucci wrote: Hmmm seems like the example on that page relies on use mod_perl; to get $mod_perl::VERSION However, mod_perl.pm has changed to mod_perl2.pm in the newer version of mod_perl that's now on my system, so it doesn't appear that the example at http://perl.apache.org

Re: Apache2 namespace

2005-07-05 Thread Philip M. Gollucci
Hmmm seems like the example on that page relies on use mod_perl; to get $mod_perl::VERSION However, mod_perl.pm has changed to mod_perl2.pm in the newer version of mod_perl that's now on my system, so it doesn't appear that the example at http://perl.apache.org/docs/2.0/user/porting/compa

Re: Apache2 namespace

2005-07-05 Thread Jim Albert
Philip M. Gollucci wrote: Philip M. Gollucci wrote: Jim Albert wrote: For example, one piece of my code has use Apache::Const but I had to change that to use Apache2::Const on the server running the lastest mod_perl. Can you give me the logic to handle that properly in a single code file

Re: Problems with DBI & modperl on Irix 6.5

2005-07-05 Thread Robert Aspinall
Yes, DBI is installed and up to date, as is Apache::DBI. Robert Aspinall NOAA's National Ocean Service CO-OPS/Information Systems Division 1305 East-West Highway Bldg. SSMC4, Station Id 6314 Silver Spring, MD 20910 [EMAIL PROTECTED] Michael Peters wrote: Robert Aspinall wrote:

Re: Problems with DBI & modperl on Irix 6.5

2005-07-05 Thread Michael Peters
Robert Aspinall wrote: > Hello, > > I'm running modperl 1.29 on Apache 1.3.31 with Perl 5.8.2, running on > Irix 6.5.25m. > > When I try to use the Apache::DBI module, I get the following > > > Can't load > '/opt/perl-5.8.2/lib/site_perl/5.8.2/IP27-irix/auto/DBI/DBI.so' for > module DBI: 711212

Problems with DBI & modperl on Irix 6.5

2005-07-05 Thread Robert Aspinall
Hello, I'm running modperl 1.29 on Apache 1.3.31 with Perl 5.8.2, running on Irix 6.5.25m. When I try to use the Apache::DBI module, I get the following Can't load '/opt/perl-5.8.2/lib/site_perl/5.8.2/IP27-irix/auto/DBI/DBI.so' for module DBI: 71121247:/var/sgi_apache/server/sbin/httpd: rl

Re: module requires either Apache::Foo or Apache2::Foo

2005-07-05 Thread Geoffrey Young
> I would argue that there is another case that is not as rare; > dependencies. If a user tries to install my module via CPAN I would like > it to be able to determine what other things need to be tracked down. > And these dependencies may be different depending on the target mod_perl > API versi

Re: module requires either Apache::Foo or Apache2::Foo

2005-07-05 Thread Michael Peters
Geoffrey Young wrote: >>>as a community we really ought to figure out the "right" way to do this >>>and abstract it into something everyone can just cut-and-paste. or, >>>better, include it as a package in both mp1 and mp2. >> >> >>I think the "best" way might be to look to Apache::Test. Figuring

Re: module requires either Apache::Foo or Apache2::Foo

2005-07-05 Thread Geoffrey Young
>> as a community we really ought to figure out the "right" way to do this >> and abstract it into something everyone can just cut-and-paste. or, >> better, include it as a package in both mp1 and mp2. > > > I think the "best" way might be to look to Apache::Test. Figuring out > which one to us