Perrin Harkins wrote:
> Guys, I understand that you're interested in discussing the dynamics of
> programming teams and hiring approaches, but it really isn't on-topic
> for this list. It isn't even specifically about Perl. Maybe one of you
> could start a thread on http://discuss.joelonsoftware.
Have you tried putting a "use Module" inside of a section in the
config or in your startup.pl and testing how many times that gets run?
> My sneaky plan is to have the startup script start off an independent
> single-threaded process (if this is possible).
This would probably be more easily don
Guys, I understand that you're interested in discussing the dynamics of
programming teams and hiring approaches, but it really isn't on-topic
for this list. It isn't even specifically about Perl. Maybe one of you
could start a thread on http://discuss.joelonsoftware.com/?biz and post
the URL here
On Mon, 2005-06-20 at 16:45 -0600, Aaron Scott wrote:
> I can duplicate it with the following simple example:
>
> -- mod_perl.conf
>
> PerlRequire conf/startup.pl
>
>
> SetHandler perl-script
> PerlResponseHandler MyHandler
>
>
>
> -- startup.pl
>
> use SomeDir::MyPackage;
>
>
>
> --
Ian D. Stewart wrote:
> It has been my personal experience that alot of the design
> breakthroughs happen as a direct result of informal conversations in
> the hallways, around the watercooler, in the smoking area, etc. This
> sort of dynamic interaction just isn't possible in a telecommute
>
Hello guys,
I've asked this before, but I hope to follow through on the suggestions
contributed by you guys.
You know that Apache2 restarts itself, so a PerlRequire or a
PerlPostConfigRequire will be run more than once. A friendly mailing
list reader suggests using Apache2::ServerUtil::resta
uh, hate to bring up a no-brainer, but just out of curiosity, is
the Content-length request header accurate for the encoded payload
*after* it's encoded? just on the off chance that libapreq2 is
stricter than libapreq1, an error like "end of file reached" would
occur if there was extraneous data af
Not just being outsourced. But I don't think even with today's
technologies you can create better team dynamics than in physical
presence with the rest of the guys. Unless you are a super programmer
who can change the world just by being in the basement 8x5, team play
(not just with the co-deve
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
> I am amazed by the technology companies that think that programming
> requires physical presence in the 21st century. Yeesh.
I'm all for it. Among other good reasons, requiring a physical presence
is a great insurance against being outsourced.
-
"D. Hageman" writes:
> ggRIASUVORK5CYII=\r\n--AaB03x--
^^
Missing an \r\n there I think.
--
Joe Schaefer
Ian D. Stewart wrote:
Dodger wrote:
If you're unwilling to let a programmer telecommute, you're still in the
dark ages, and I wouldn't want to work for you anyway.
I am amazed by the technology companies that think that programming
requires physical presence in the 21st century. Yeesh.
Th
> But those should be two totally separate files with separate package
> declarations at the top. It doesn't make sense that there would be
any
> namespace collisions.
>
> - Perrin
I can duplicate it with the following simple example:
-- mod_perl.conf
PerlRequire conf/startup.pl
SetHandl
On Mon, 2005-06-20 at 16:04 -0600, Aaron Scott wrote:
> For a file /path/to/SomeDir/MyPackage.pm, if I 'use MyPackage;' in one
> file, then subsequently 'use SomeDir::MyPackage' in another file, the
> second 'use' generates redefined subroutine errors.
But those should be two totally separate file
> Huh? Are you saying that MyPackage and SomeDir::MyPackage are somehow
> the same file? Or that they actually declare the same package name?
Or
> don't declare any package name at all?
>
> - Perrin
For a file /path/to/SomeDir/MyPackage.pm, if I 'use MyPackage;' in one
file, then subsequently '
I have a mod_perl module that I wrote for mod_perl 1.x that would accept
an image upload from VBA script running under Microsoft Access. I then
converted it to use mod_perl 2.0.1 and Apache2::Upload 2.0.5. It seems to
work fine using a web browser, but it doesn't appear to like my upload
fr
On Mon, 2005-06-20 at 14:06 -0600, Aaron Scott wrote:
> FWIW, I've noticed redefined subroutine "errors" when I require a single
> package using two different statements. E.g.,
>
> --- File1.pm
>
> use MyPackage;
>
> --File2.pm
>
> use SomeDir::MyPackage;
>
>
>
> Loading File2 when Fil
Hello,
I have a fairly basic question as I'm not quite sure I get the big
picture on modules. Maybe someone can give me a better picture.
I'll use 3 example modules: Main, Main::Config, and Main::HTML
Main is the main object which contains the variables needed (like
$main->{config}) which it
FWIW, I've noticed redefined subroutine "errors" when I require a single
package using two different statements. E.g.,
--- File1.pm
use MyPackage;
--File2.pm
use SomeDir::MyPackage;
Loading File2 when File1 has already been loaded seemed to cause a
redefined subroutine.
---
Aaron Scot
On Mon, 2005-06-20 at 20:22 +0200, Kjetil Kjernsmo wrote:
> > No, you want the hash, not the object it's tied to:
> > $r->pnotes('session' => \%session);
> >
> > Then use it like this:
> > my $session_ref = $r->pnotes('session');
> > $session->{'key'} = 'value';
>
> Uh, actually, that's what I did
On Friday 17 June 2005 06:00, Perrin Harkins wrote:
> > I currently assign to pnotes like this:
> > $r->pnotes(session => tied %session);
>
> No, you want the hash, not the object it's tied to:
> $r->pnotes('session' => \%session);
>
> Then use it like this:
> my $session_ref = $r->pnotes('sess
Dodger wrote:
If you're unwilling to let a programmer telecommute, you're still in the
dark ages, and I wouldn't want to work for you anyway.
I am amazed by the technology companies that think that programming
requires physical presence in the 21st century. Yeesh.
This is only true if you r
Can you confirm you have the same version of Perl on
both systems?
I've seen these errors on perl 5.8 after upgrading
from perl 5.005
Marty
p.s. I still have them too, so any help with this
issue would be useful to me too...
--- Boysenberry Payne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Here is a samp
22 matches
Mail list logo
