The consensus on perlmonks seems to be that GD and ImageMagick can be
a pain.
I'm gonna try netpbm and Imager. i've used NetPBM in the past and
found it pretty fast and super easy to install.
On Mar 5, 2005, at 11:57 PM, Sam Tregar wrote:
Krang (http://krang.sf.net) uses Imager to do thumbn
On Sat, 5 Mar 2005, jonathan vanasco wrote:
> What have people here found good to use (a2/mp2)?
> As far as CPAN mods/interfaces go
> GD seems to be faster , but it looks awful
> ImageMagick looks better, more stress on the server
> Imager looks simple, but even more stress
Kr
# The following was supposedly scribed by
# jonathan vanasco
# on Saturday 05 March 2005 05:02 pm:
>I'm trying to figure out a way to standardize image uploads and make
>thumbnails
>
>What have people here found good to use (a2/mp2)?
I've been considering a rewrite of Apache::AutoIndex (if Philip
I'm trying to figure out a way to standardize image uploads and make
thumbnails
What have people here found good to use (a2/mp2)?
As far as CPAN mods/interfaces go
GD seems to be faster , but it looks awful
ImageMagick looks better, more stress on the server
Imager looks
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I said:
|>> If Debian testing turns out to have this problem, I think that
|>> the test should at least be skipped [...]
On Fri, 04 Mar 2005 15:07:36 -0500, Stas Bekman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
|> No.
Well, it's your call Stas. I can perfectly live w
