Hi,
If I want to use CGI::Session or CGI::Application, can I do it if I use
mod_perl or there are better modules for using with MP?
Thanks.
Teddy
> There are a few critical fixes related to cookie handling which haven't
> made
> it into an official "release" yet. I've also found a bug where
> Apache::Request used to let you set ->status(), but doesn't anymore.
off the absolute top of my head I think you want
$apr->env->status
HTH
--Ge
* John D Groenveld shaped the electrons to say...
I've had no problems so far with libapreq2-2.04-dev, but with light usage.
http://httpd.apache.org/apreq/>
$ /opt/apache2/perl-5.8.6/bin/perl -MApache::Request -le 'print
$Apache::Request::VERSION' 2.04-dev
There are a few critical fixes related to
Skylos wrote:
My first suggestion based on a migration the company I work for did
not too long ago would be to use apache2 in thread mode. There was a
staggering drop in system memory resources consumed when we made the
shift - from most of a gigabyte to only a few hundred megs! The
site's respo
Larry Leszczynski wrote:
[...]
Probably the biggest bang for the buck with the least effort or code
changes is to set up a lightweight (i.e. non-mod_perl) reverse proxy httpd
in front of the httpd that is running mod_perl:
http://perl.apache.org/docs/1.0/guide/strategy.html#Adding_a_Proxy_Server_in
Way not enough information. Like, you can host 30 websites on a
386sx-25 with 64 megs of ram - if they're low
demand enough. It really has no relevancy to the number of sites.
Its all about how many file presentations you're handling, and more
importantly, how many dynamic script presentations y
Hey there
It strikes me that your problem is directly related to memory usage.
Linux machines have a bad problem in that if your apache children get
swapped out ->for any reason at all<-, they will lose any shared memory
that they may have had before being swapped out. When they are swapped
b
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, "B. Duffee" writes:
>Can anybody make a good guess on when the mod_perl 2 port of Apache::Request
>will be finished? I came a little unstuck installing from CPAN when I found t
>he
>versions weren't compatible and I'm wondering if I should back off to mod_perl
> 1
On Fri, 14 Jan 2005 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> We have recently added a site to our server which hosts 30 other sites.
> The new site uses modperl & MySQL. After adding the new site, the server
> we were on (shared server at a national server farm) had major resource
> problems (too many connecti
Thanks for the suggestions. We are planning on migrating to Apache 2.0,
but I need to read up on the implications to the various sites first.
Do you think this server has enough resources to handle our sites without
trouble?
Sys
>>
>> But before I go any further with testing & modifying configur
No, i didn't preload the scripts - I'm not familiar with the
technique, and it seems like there's enough dynamic fvariable-writing
and storage of html values done in the scripts that large chunks would
be unfairly 'written' and cause duplication. Its a bad system design
for this volume, it should
Skylos wrote:
Also, to compare, I work with an apache 1.3 site that has alot of cgi
perl script on it. With the idea that shifting to mod_perl registry
mode would cause this site to go faster, I modified the configuration.
And watched the system load average rapidly climb into the
multiple-hundre
My first suggestion based on a migration the company I work for did
not too long ago would be to use apache2 in thread mode. There was a
staggering drop in system memory resources consumed when we made the
shift - from most of a gigabyte to only a few hundred megs! The
site's response speed pick
Patrick LeBoutillier wrote:
Hi all,
Should I include the generated t/TEST file in my module distribution
or should I let the users system generate it?
The latter. You should always generate it during 'perl Makefile.PL'
because you want to set the perl path right. also because filter_args()
insert
Hi there,
Can anybody make a good guess on when the mod_perl 2 port of Apache::Request
will be finished? I came a little unstuck installing from CPAN when I found
the
versions weren't compatible and I'm wondering if I should back off to mod_perl
1
or wait for the port.
thanks,
---
Boyd Duff
First let me apologize if this is not the appropriate forum for my question.
I thought it would be because the issue has to do with
apache/modperl/mysql performance.
We have recently added a site to our server which hosts 30 other sites.
The new site uses modperl & MySQL. After adding the new site
> I'm trying to write a mod_perl script (for PerlRun) that will present an
> online interface to my Mac OS X Address Book.
I've litterally just started to do something like this:
http://svn.cuckoo.org/CPAN/Mac-AddressBook2Web/
It would work very differently though.
1) Script (to put in cron)
Hi all,
Should I include the generated t/TEST file in my module distribution
or should I let the users system generate it?
Thanks,
Patrick
--
=
Patrick LeBoutllier
Laval, Québec, Canada
Well, if you mean restarting the whole computer, no; but I had shut down
and restarted the webserver a few times, and always gotten the same results.
Martin Moss wrote:
please forgive the really daft question, but have done
a complete server shutdown and restart?
I've come across bus errors befor
please forgive the really daft question, but have done
a complete server shutdown and restart?
I've come across bus errors before where a complete
server restart made the problem go away and never come
back...
Marty
--- Brian Dimeler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Sorry for cross-posting this,
Sorry for cross-posting this, but i think it applies to both groups.
I'm trying to write a mod_perl script (for PerlRun) that will present an
online interface to my Mac OS X Address Book. Using the standard method
of connecting to the glue (new Mac::Glue 'Address Book') doesn't work;
the webserv
21 matches
Mail list logo
