Memory leakage?

2004-10-13 Thread Batara Kesuma
Hi, I am using mod_perl 1.99_13, with Apache 2.0.49. When I start the processes, free shows me that about 17 MB of swap is used. And ps -aux, shows me that each httpd process eats up to 1.1 %MEM. But after about 30 minutes running, the swap memory usage will increase to up to about 200 MB, and eac

Re: Modperl setup Linux (which version)?

2004-10-13 Thread Martin Moss
Not for Mp2 but did you come across this link? http://www.brtnet.org/linux/rtinstall.htm Marty --- Jon Forrest <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Maybe others know something that I don't know, > but I was unable to build mod_perl2 with apache 2 > on either Mandrake 10.0 or Fedora Core 2. I sent > se

Re: Modperl setup Linux (which version)?

2004-10-13 Thread Stas Bekman
Jon Forrest wrote: Maybe others know something that I don't know, but I was unable to build mod_perl2 with apache 2 on either Mandrake 10.0 or Fedora Core 2. I sent several bug reports to this list summarizing the problems. Hmm, but Jon, you didn't followup on this email: http://article.gmane.org/g

Re: [mp2] & Apache2: undefined symbol: PL_localizing

2004-10-13 Thread Stas Bekman
Joe Orton wrote: On Wed, Oct 13, 2004 at 05:02:30PM -0400, Stas Bekman wrote: Joe Orton wrote: If -lperl was specified on the link line and ldd does not show a dependency on libperl.so.N, then barring a complete linker fubar, it must be the case that a libperl.a was linked statically. I doubt that

Re: [mp2] & Apache2: undefined symbol: PL_localizing

2004-10-13 Thread Joe Orton
On Wed, Oct 13, 2004 at 05:02:30PM -0400, Stas Bekman wrote: > Joe Orton wrote: > >If -lperl was specified on the link line and ldd does not show a > >dependency on libperl.so.N, then barring a complete linker fubar, it > >must be the case that a libperl.a was linked statically. > > I doubt that t

Re: [mp2] & Apache2: undefined symbol: PL_localizing

2004-10-13 Thread Stas Bekman
Joe Orton wrote: On Wed, Oct 13, 2004 at 08:26:43AM -0400, Stas Bekman wrote: Joe Orton wrote: This problem is probably caused by a bogus libperl.a on your system somewhere. What does: ls -l /usr/lib/perl/5.6.1/CORE/libperl.* /usr/lib/libperl.* \ /usr/local/lib/libperl.* give? IMHO, it's libperl

Re: Modperl setup Linux (which version)?

2004-10-13 Thread Stef1
Frank Wiles wrote: On Wed, 13 Oct 2004 16:47:51 +0100 (BST) Martin Moss <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I would disagree about learning mod perl 2 straight away. But, I guess it depends on why you are learning it. I haven't found anybody using modperl 2.0 yet. (but that's not a reason

graceful restart

2004-10-13 Thread Drew Taylor
I've always used a full start & stop (ie. apachectl stop; apachectl start ) with my mod_perl servers when I need it to pick up new code because I read (many years ago) that graceful restarts could leak memory or cause some sort of problem. It's been long enough that I don't even remember the proble

[JOB] full time entry level position in Toronto, ON

2004-10-13 Thread Adam Prime x443
Here's the job posting thing: Brunico Communications Inc., a high-energy entrepreneurial company based in Toronto, seeks an experienced programmer to join our web development team in the following key role: Web Developer Working in conjunction wi

Re: Modperl setup Linux (which version)?

2004-10-13 Thread Perrin Harkins
On Wed, 2004-10-13 at 14:05, Frank Wiles wrote: > Wow 20%! I knew you would gain some speed advantage by ditching > threads, but I didn't realize it was quite big of a difference. This is from perlbench. The benchmarks are here: http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=apache-modperl&m=10685159843050

Re: Modperl setup Linux (which version)?

2004-10-13 Thread Frank Wiles
On Wed, 13 Oct 2004 12:58:10 -0400 Perrin Harkins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Wed, 2004-10-13 at 12:50, Barksdale, Ray wrote: > > Being currious, did you > > attempt to compile against the Fedora Perl or did you roll your own? > > I don't know that this would be a source of trouble since I've

Re: Modperl setup Linux (which version)?

2004-10-13 Thread Jon Forrest
Barksdale, Ray wrote: Just echoing Frank. I'm in the process of converting our last MP1 app (Hylafax application) to MP2 on Fedora Core 2. Being currious, did you attempt to compile against the Fedora Perl or did you roll your own? I built everything from sources using what was the latest versions

RE: Modperl setup Linux (which version)?

2004-10-13 Thread Perrin Harkins
On Wed, 2004-10-13 at 12:50, Barksdale, Ray wrote: > Being currious, did you > attempt to compile against the Fedora Perl or did you roll your own? > I don't know that this would be a source of trouble since I've built > my own Perl(s) since RedHat 7 to stay single threaded. I've never attempted >

RE: Modperl setup Linux (which version)?

2004-10-13 Thread Barksdale, Ray
Just echoing Frank. I'm in the process of converting our last MP1 app (Hylafax application) to MP2 on Fedora Core 2. Being currious, did you attempt to compile against the Fedora Perl or did you roll your own? I don't know that this would be a source of trouble since I've built my own Perl(s) since

Re: Modperl setup Linux (which version)?

2004-10-13 Thread Frank Wiles
On Wed, 13 Oct 2004 09:03:46 -0700 Jon Forrest <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Maybe others know something that I don't know, > but I was unable to build mod_perl2 with apache 2 > on either Mandrake 10.0 or Fedora Core 2. I sent > several bug reports to this list summarizing > the problems. > > Sinc

Re: Modperl setup Linux (which version)?

2004-10-13 Thread Jon Forrest
Maybe others know something that I don't know, but I was unable to build mod_perl2 with apache 2 on either Mandrake 10.0 or Fedora Core 2. I sent several bug reports to this list summarizing the problems. Since my goal was to build Request Tracker, and their documentation strongly advises against m

Re: Modperl setup Linux (which version)?

2004-10-13 Thread Frank Wiles
On Wed, 13 Oct 2004 16:47:51 +0100 (BST) Martin Moss <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I would disagree about learning mod perl 2 straight > away. But, I guess it depends on why you are learning > it. > > I haven't found anybody using modperl 2.0 yet. (but > that's not a reason not to use it) I just f

Re: Modperl setup Linux (which version)?

2004-10-13 Thread Frank Wiles
On Wed, 13 Oct 2004 15:13:34 + "steve silvers" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I'm currently building a system at home to start learning modperl, and > would like to get your advice as to what version and flavor of Linux > you recommend. ie: RedHat, SuSe, etc... Please state the Linux, > Apache,

[ANNOUNCE] MKDoc-1.6.29 (stable) released

2004-10-13 Thread Chris Croome
Hi The latest stable version of MKDoc (a mod_perl CMS) is out, details follow and are also here: http://mkdoc.com/news/mkdoc-1629-stable-released/ Chris -- Chris Croome <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> web design http://www.webarchitects.co.uk/

Re: Mod perl performance and DSO?

2004-10-13 Thread Martin Moss
eek, sorry, you guessed right at apache 1.x (1.3.31) Marty --- William McKee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Wed, Oct 13, 2004 at 12:46:19PM +0100, Martin > Moss wrote: > > Hmmm, I'm a little concerned that using DSO does > have > > a performance hit for no real benefit for what we > wish > > t

Re: Mod perl performance and DSO?

2004-10-13 Thread William McKee
On Wed, Oct 13, 2004 at 12:46:19PM +0100, Martin Moss wrote: > Hmmm, I'm a little concerned that using DSO does have > a performance hit for no real benefit for what we wish > to do. Hmm, now just need to find instructions on > building apache with mod_ssl, mod_perl and mod_php? > without using DSO

Re: Mod perl performance and DSO?

2004-10-13 Thread Martin Moss
Hmmm, I'm a little concerned that using DSO does have a performance hit for no real benefit for what we wish to do. Hmm, now just need to find instructions on building apache with mod_ssl, mod_perl and mod_php? without using DSO, any ideas? (whilst I'm off to google...) Marty --- William McKee

Re: [mp2] & Apache2: undefined symbol: PL_localizing

2004-10-13 Thread Joe Orton
On Wed, Oct 13, 2004 at 08:26:43AM -0400, Stas Bekman wrote: > Joe Orton wrote: > >This problem is probably caused by a bogus libperl.a on your system > >somewhere. What does: > > > >ls -l /usr/lib/perl/5.6.1/CORE/libperl.* /usr/lib/libperl.* \ > > /usr/local/lib/libperl.* > > > >give? > > IMH

Re: [mp2] & Apache2: undefined symbol: PL_localizing

2004-10-13 Thread Stas Bekman
Joe Orton wrote: On Mon, Oct 11, 2004 at 11:47:33PM +0200, MARTIN Pierre wrote: Please do: cd src/modules/perl/ rm mod_perl.so make -f Makefile.modperl Here we go: /data/misc/mod_perl-1.99_16/src/modules/perl# rm mod_perl.so /data/misc/mod_perl-1.99_16/src/modules/perl# make -f Makefile.modperl rm