Re: Turning off modperl in specific directories

2004-05-20 Thread Stas Bekman
Chad Arimura wrote: Sorry.. 2 hours of messing around, I decide to email the list, and 3 minutes later I figure out the problem. PerlHandler Apache::PerlRun The answer is wrong. It still runs under mod_perl, but in "mod_cgi"-like mode, not "mod_cgi". See my other reply. -- _

Re: Turning off modperl in specific directories

2004-05-20 Thread Stas Bekman
Chad Arimura wrote: I setup our server to handle requests through mod_perl with the following directive: Options FollowSymLinks ExecCGI Order allow,deny Allow from all SetHandler perl-script PerlHandler Apache::Registry There is a subdirectory underneath there that I do NOT

RE: Turning off modperl in specific directories

2004-05-20 Thread Chad Arimura
  Sorry…. 2 hours of messing around, I decide to email the list, and 3 minutes later I figure out the problem.   PerlHandler Apache::PerlRun   If anybody has anything to add, please do.  But it works now.     Cheers, Chad   From: Chad Arimura [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Se

Turning off modperl in specific directories

2004-05-20 Thread Chad Arimura
  I setup our server to handle requests through mod_perl with the following directive:   Options FollowSymLinks ExecCGI Order allow,deny Allow from all   SetHandler perl-script PerlHandler Apache::Registry          There is a subdirectory underneath there that I do NOT wan

Re: Segfaults with some modules, positional dependent

2004-05-20 Thread Stas Bekman
[Chris, please keep the thread on the list. Thanks] Christopher P. Lindsey wrote: [Thu May 20 03:19:31 2004] [notice] child pid 10522 exit signal Segmentation fault (11) You need to show us the core backtrace. And may be rebuild your mod_perl and/or perl with debug enabled before that. You also

Re: Segfaults with some modules, positional dependent

2004-05-20 Thread Stas Bekman
Christopher P. Lindsey wrote: I'm having a weird problem with certain modules causing perl scripts to segfault. The errors in the log are like [Thu May 20 03:19:31 2004] [notice] child pid 10522 exit signal Segmentation fault (11) You need to show us the core backtrace. And may be rebuild you

Re: Fwd: Re: some children not returning newly-inserted data

2004-05-20 Thread Dave Boodman
BINGO! If you're ever in San Diego, please contact me. I owe you a beer and dinner. Dave At 12:49 AM 5/20/2004, Perrin Harkins wrote: Dave Boodman wrote: I don't remember you mentioning that before. If something is not getting committed to the database, that would cause the process that did the in

Segfaults with some modules, positional dependent

2004-05-20 Thread Christopher P. Lindsey
I'm having a weird problem with certain modules causing perl scripts to segfault. The errors in the log are like [Thu May 20 03:19:31 2004] [notice] child pid 10522 exit signal Segmentation fault (11) The module causing the problems is Sys::Hostname. The perl script has the line use Sy

Re: [RELEASE CANDIDATE] mod_perl-1.99_14 RC1

2004-05-20 Thread Randy Kobes
On Thu, 20 May 2004, Steve Hay wrote: > Randy Kobes wrote: > > >On Thu, 20 May 2004, Geoffrey Young wrote: > > > >>a release candidate for mod_perl 1.99_14 is now available for testing. > >> > >> > >Hi Geoff, > > On Win32 (perl-5.8.3, ActivePerl 809 compatible), with > >Apache/2.0.49, there's a

Re: FW: Possible Bug: mod_perl version 1 conflict with IBM Websphere Apache plugin

2004-05-20 Thread Geoffrey Young
> I suppose it's coming from perl_shutdown below: > > static void mp_dso_unload(void *data) > { > array_header *librefs; > > librefs = xs_dl_librefs((pool *)data); > perl_destruct_level = 2; > perl_shutdown(NULL, NULL); > unload_xs_so(librefs); > } mod_perl as a dso in 1.0 i

Re: [RELEASE CANDIDATE] mod_perl-1.99_14 RC1

2004-05-20 Thread Steve Hay
Steve Hay wrote: >Your patch seems fine anyway, apart from one problem: I have >apache\conftree.t failing tests 6-7. Here's the output under -verbose: > ># expected: C:\apache2\sources\mod_perl-1.99_14-dev\t\htdocs ># received: "C:\apache2\sources\mod_perl-1.99_14-dev\t\htdocs" >not ok 6 ># expe

Re: [RELEASE CANDIDATE] mod_perl-1.99_14 RC1

2004-05-20 Thread Steve Hay
Randy Kobes wrote: >On Thu, 20 May 2004, Geoffrey Young wrote: > > > >>a release candidate for mod_perl 1.99_14 is now available for testing. >> >> >Hi Geoff, > On Win32 (perl-5.8.3, ActivePerl 809 compatible), with >Apache/2.0.49, there's a problem (often) in starting the >tests, due to T

Re: Fwd: Re: some children not returning newly-inserted data

2004-05-20 Thread Dave Boodman
And that is the correct primary key for this table? yes > The return from the ->search looks like > > $VAR1 = \bless( { >  'sysid' => '158' >    }, 'Lib::Systems' ); >   $VAR1 = \bless( { >  'sysid' => '1065' >    }, 'Lib:

Re: Fwd: Re: some children not returning newly-inserted data

2004-05-20 Thread Dave Boodman
PK wasn't the problem. If you don't define it, it uses the first col. Even explicitly defined it didn't work. The return from the ->search looks like $VAR1 = \bless( { 'sysid' => '158' }, 'Lib::Systems' ); $VAR1 = \bless( { 'sysid' => '10

Re: FW: Possible Bug: mod_perl version 1 conflict with IBM Websphere Apache plugin

2004-05-20 Thread Stas Bekman
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi Stas Sorry, are you saying that you feel the problem is in the Perl code rather than mod_perl ? I managed to track the fact that the Perl_safesysfree() is a Perl method, but could not determine if that was the cause or another symptym of the error we are seeing. Frankly,

RE: FW: Possible Bug: mod_perl version 1 conflict with IBM Websphere Apache plugin

2004-05-20 Thread darren.heather
Hi Stas Sorry, are you saying that you feel the problem is in the Perl code rather than mod_perl ? I managed to track the fact that the Perl_safesysfree() is a Perl method, but could not determine if that was the cause or another symptym of the error we are seeing. Below are some additional sec

Re: Fwd: Re: some children not returning newly-inserted data

2004-05-20 Thread Perrin Harkins
Dave Boodman wrote: I don't remember you mentioning that before. If something is not getting committed to the database, that would cause the process that did the insert to see it, and none of the others. You also should not be able to see it when connecting to the database from a query tool if it