'ellow,
I have been trying to compile mod_perl1.99_13 but have found what I
believe to be a bug in the Makefile.PL.
I am using Debian woody with the Apache2 from backports.org. I am using
the prefork (Apache1-style) MPM because I read in the mod_perl2
documentation that if you have Perl 5.6.1 th
Charlie Smith wrote:
Trying to include a file with the require statement in the t/My/Bug.pm file
did not work. I was hoping to show how changing path from absolute to
relative
causes problem with require statement under MP2.
Sounds like you need this:
http://perl.apache.org/docs/2.0/user/porting/
After having to specify full path to require files, I found that there were
some more errors showing up in the error log concerning RegistryCooker.pm on
lines 168 and 745 as follows:
[Sat Mar 13 16:24:35 2004] [error] [client 10.2.1.52] Argument
"cmd=browse&dir=" isn't numeric in subroutine
Geoff and Stas,
Thanks for your help so far. It's great to have such experts available such
as yourselves. And the humor is even good to ;--)--
The $ENV{MOD_PER} is being returned now with the following syntax in the
httpd.conf file:
Options Indexes FollowSymLinks MultiViews
E
I understand. I was serious about the postings being very funny
;)
I've followed this list for over a year now. Thanks for the kind
words.
And kidding about 'ganging up' ;0)
>>> "Cees Hek" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 03/13/04
09:44AM >>>Charlie Smith wrote:> Very funny. You guys
are ganging up
Charlie Smith wrote:
Very funny. You guys are ganging up on me. What ever the count is, I
get the point.
Don't take it personal. I doubt it was intended directly at you,
although I can understand if you thought it was. If you follow this
list regularly, you will notice that very few users f
On Mar 12, 2004, at 5:12 PM, Stas Bekman wrote:
John D.Lima wrote:
*snip*
For clarity (?): my PerlPreConnectionHandler works great on browser
requests
coming into the proxy, but it runs again when the server response to
the proxied
request returns _to the proxy_. In this server response case I
Very
funny. You guys are ganging up on me. What ever the count is,
I get the point.>>> "Stas Bekman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
03/12/04 05:42PM >>>Geoffrey Young wrote:>>It should be
there. If it's not, then we need to be able to reproduce it>>and you
need to help us to do that.> > > I just tes
Hi there,
On Fri, 12 Mar 2004, Stelian Iancu wrote:
> I am trying to setup mod_perl on my server. I have apache 1.3.29 and
> mod_perl 1.27-r4 (on a Gentoo box).
>
> Here is the relevant section of commonapache.conf:
Er, section of what?! We normally call it httpd.conf - is this
something that's