Re: bug report in mod_perl 1.99_13 installation

2004-03-09 Thread Daniel Risacher
I get a clean build from CVS now. -- "The blues are multicolored." -- Dave Lambert Daniel Risacher [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Report problems: http://perl.apache.org/bugs/ Mail list info: http://perl.apache.org/maillist/modperl.html List etiquette: http://perl.apache.org

Re[2]: how best to debug random SEGVs?

2004-03-09 Thread justin
For what it is worth and in case anyone googles for this issue in future, the segvs went away when I applied the latest kernel patches and glibc stuff for redhat9, and the latest perl install, from updates.redhat.com the kernel is now 2.4.20-30.9smp perl is now perl 5.8.0 with MAINT18379 patch

Re: how best to debug random SEGVs?

2004-03-09 Thread Stas Bekman
justin wrote: Our modperl servers with apache+modperl >= versions 1.3.28 and modperl 1.28, crash randomly with [Tue Mar 9 18:02:17 2004] [notice] child pid 10940 exit signal Segmentation fault (11) [...] How can I best debug this? perhaps capture the segv and do a stack trace or write a core file?

Re: # of threads needed to run winnt mpm correlates to # of vhosts

2004-03-09 Thread Stas Bekman
Bill Stoddard wrote: William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote: How interesting! thanks for the discovery... FirstBill actually created the connection threadpool for mpm_winnt, iirc, so i'll punt to him or tackle next week. At 11:50 AM 3/9/2004, Stas Bekman wrote: Steve Hay wrote: Steve Hay wrote: I'll t

Re: [RELEASE CANDIDATE] please test mod_perl-1.99_13-dev.tar.gz

2004-03-09 Thread Matthew Darwin
I'll be using .12 in production in 3 weeks. Just running tests now. Stas Bekman wrote: Charlie Smith wrote: Is this the mod_perl version we should be using with Apache 2 then? Yes. Assuming all tests go well? Yes What is fate of mp2 at this time? Once the API is frozen and document

how best to debug random SEGVs?

2004-03-09 Thread justin
Our modperl servers with apache+modperl >= versions 1.3.28 and modperl 1.28, crash randomly with [Tue Mar 9 18:02:17 2004] [notice] child pid 10940 exit signal Segmentation fault (11) I'd say on the order of 1 in 100 requests or less. But after an hour, the above lines collect in the error log,

Re: # of threads needed to run winnt mpm correlates to # of vhosts

2004-03-09 Thread William A. Rowe, Jr.
How interesting! thanks for the discovery... FirstBill actually created the connection threadpool for mpm_winnt, iirc, so i'll punt to him or tackle next week. At 11:50 AM 3/9/2004, Stas Bekman wrote: >Steve Hay wrote: >>Steve Hay wrote: >> >>>I'll try chopping some of the new (post _12) tests

Re: Bad fix for "fix "PerlSetVar Foo 0" so that $r->dir_config('Foo') returns 0, not undef" in dev tree

2004-03-09 Thread Dave Rolsky
On Tue, 9 Mar 2004, Geoffrey Young wrote: > ok, the attached patch fixes the problem. it turns out that XS as simple as > this > > RETVAL = Nullsv; > > if (!SvOK(RETVAL)) { > XSRETURN_UNDEF; > } > > dumps core all on its own (without mod_perl's help :) > > will be fixed in the n

Re: [RELEASE CANDIDATE] please test mod_perl-1.99_13-dev.tar.gz: make test failes on solaris 9

2004-03-09 Thread Stas Bekman
Jie Gao wrote: [...] That's great, Jie. Could you rewrite it not to use any external applications, but pure perl? The problem with external apps is that args and location vary from platform to platfrom and even from one release to another. Also using perl we won't need to write a separate implement

Re: bug report in mod_perl 1.99_13 installation

2004-03-09 Thread Stas Bekman
Stas Bekman wrote: Enrico Sorcinelli wrote: On Tue, 09 Mar 2004 11:22:59 +0100 Arnaud Blancher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: t/hooks/cleanup.ok 1/2# Failed test 2 in t/hooks/cleanup.t at line 40 t/hooks/cleanup.FAILED test 2 Failed 1/2 tests, 5

Re: bug report in mod_perl 1.99_13 installation

2004-03-09 Thread Stas Bekman
Enrico Sorcinelli wrote: On Tue, 09 Mar 2004 11:22:59 +0100 Arnaud Blancher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: t/hooks/cleanup.ok 1/2# Failed test 2 in t/hooks/cleanup.t at line 40 t/hooks/cleanup.FAILED test 2 Failed 1/2 tests, 50.00% okay t/hooks/c

Re: bug report in mod_perl 1.99_13 installation

2004-03-09 Thread Stas Bekman
No need for any extra info as I can see all these errors with a fresh package run under root: t/directive/perl.t 84 50.00% 2-3 6-7 t/directive/perldo.t 142 14.29% 11 14 t/hooks/cleanup.t 21 50.00% 2 t/hooks/cleanup2.t

Re: Bad fix for "fix "PerlSetVar Foo 0" so that $r->dir_config('Foo') returns 0, not undef" in dev tree

2004-03-09 Thread Geoffrey Young
Geoffrey Young wrote: -if (!SvTRUE(RETVAL)) { +if (!SvOK(RETVAL)) { ok, the attached patch fixes the problem. it turns out that XS as simple as this RETVAL = Nullsv; if (!SvOK(RETVAL)) { XSRETURN_UNDEF; } dumps core all on its own (without mod_perl's help :)

Re: bug report in mod_perl 1.99_13 installation

2004-03-09 Thread Stas Bekman
Daniel Risacher wrote: I get these errors with yesterday's CVS (some of which are the same that Arnaud saw): t/modules/include...ok 2/6# Failed test 4 in t/modules/include.t at line 32 fail #2 # Failed test 5 in t/modules/include.t at line 32 fail #3 t/modules/include.

Re: # of threads needed to run winnt mpm correlates to # of vhosts

2004-03-09 Thread Stas Bekman
Steve Hay wrote: Steve Hay wrote: I'll try chopping some of the new (post _12) tests out to see if I can get it working again. If I remove: t/htdocs/vhost/startup.pl t/response/TestVhost/config.pm t/vhost/config.t then run "t/TEST -conf" and then try "nmake test" again, then it's a

Re: [RELEASE CANDIDATE] please test mod_perl-1.99_13-dev.tar.gz

2004-03-09 Thread Randy Kobes
On Tue, 9 Mar 2004, Steve Hay wrote: > Steve Hay wrote: > > >I'll try chopping some of the new (post _12) tests out to see if I can > >get it working again. > > > If I remove: > > t/htdocs/vhost/startup.pl > t/response/TestVhost/config.pm > t/vhost/config.t > > then run "t/TEST -conf"

Re: bug report in mod_perl 1.99_13 installation

2004-03-09 Thread Enrico Sorcinelli
On Tue, 09 Mar 2004 11:22:59 +0100 Arnaud Blancher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > t/hooks/cleanup.ok 1/2# Failed test 2 in > t/hooks/cleanup.t at line 40 > t/hooks/cleanup.FAILED test 2 > Failed 1/2 tests, 50.00% okay > t/hooks/cleanup2...

Re: bug report in mod_perl 1.99_13 installation

2004-03-09 Thread Daniel Risacher
I get these errors with yesterday's CVS (some of which are the same that Arnaud saw): t/modules/include...ok 2/6# Failed test 4 in t/modules/include.t at line 32 fail #2 # Failed test 5 in t/modules/include.t at line 32 fail #3 t/modules/include...FAILED

bug report in mod_perl 1.99_13 installation

2004-03-09 Thread Arnaud Blancher
-8<-- Start Bug Report 8<-- 1. Problem Description: when i do the make test, i have this message /usr/bin/perl -Iblib/arch/Apache2 -Iblib/lib/Apache2 \ t/TEST -clean [warning] setting ulimit to allow core files ulimit -c unlimited; /usr/bin/perl /home/insta

Re: [RELEASE CANDIDATE] please test mod_perl-1.99_13-dev.tar.gz

2004-03-09 Thread Steve Hay
Steve Hay wrote: >I'll try chopping some of the new (post _12) tests out to see if I can >get it working again. > If I remove: t/htdocs/vhost/startup.pl t/response/TestVhost/config.pm t/vhost/config.t then run "t/TEST -conf" and then try "nmake test" again, then it's all OK with 20

Re: spammers trolling perl list?

2004-03-09 Thread Ged Haywood
Hi there, On Tue, 9 Mar 2004 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Is anyone finding a lot of spammers trolling this list? > > I am collecting spam with the account [EMAIL PROTECTED] Not especially at the moment, but I get about 500 per week in my SpamAssassin 'caughtspam' box that you're welcome to have i

Re: [RELEASE CANDIDATE] please test mod_perl-1.99_13-dev.tar.gz

2004-03-09 Thread Steve Hay
Stas Bekman wrote: >Steve Hay wrote: > > >>I have to >>increase ThreadsPerChild in the mpm_winnt.c section >>(Apache-Test/lib/Apache/TestConfig.pm) to some value higher than 20. >>I'm not sure how much higher it needs to be, but 50 works for me. >> >> > >the worker mpm works just fine wi

Re: [RELEASE CANDIDATE] please test mod_perl-1.99_13-dev.tar.gz: make test failes on solaris 9

2004-03-09 Thread Stas Bekman
Jie Gao wrote: On Sat, 6 Mar 2004, Stas Bekman wrote: Date: Sat, 06 Mar 2004 15:25:35 -0800 From: Stas Bekman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Jie Gao <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: mod_perl Mailing List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: Re: [RELEASE CANDIDATE] please test mod_perl-1.99_13-dev.tar.gz: make test

Re: [RELEASE CANDIDATE] please test mod_perl-1.99_13-dev.tar.gz

2004-03-09 Thread Stas Bekman
Thank you all for testing this release candidate. 1.99_13 was released a few hours ago. __ Stas BekmanJAm_pH --> Just Another mod_perl Hacker http://stason.org/ mod_perl Guide ---> http://perl.apache.org mailto:[E

Re: [RELEASE CANDIDATE] please test mod_perl-1.99_13-dev.tar.gz

2004-03-09 Thread Stas Bekman
Dr. Helmut Zeilinger wrote: Hi, on Linux 2.4.22/Apache 2.48/Perl 5.9.0 the compilation of mp 1.99_13 failed (see below). Is it because of Perl version 5.9.0? Must i downgrade to Perl 5.8.x again? It's because you have an old 5.9.0. Only the very latest blead perl is supported. Upgrade to the curr