I'm trying to resolve this problem (the second part of the email where the
failure of mod_perl-1.99_12/t/response/TestModperl/request_rec_tie_api.pm is
discussed:
http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=apache-modperl&m=107570575120884&w=2
Apparently, on some AIX and FreeBSD setups we get:
fileno(ST
konsu wrote:
I've updated the patch for the current cvs source (the original one won't
apply as is), I've attached it as ipv6.patch. To apply it run:
cd modperl-2.0
patch -p0 < ipv6.patch
i could not apply the patch (please see output below). i am using the latest
modperl-2.0_20040203232656.tar.g
Philippe M. Chiasson wrote:
[...]
I'll try to summarize what you said in a table. The following approaches work
for Listen:
Apache \ OS | IPV4 | IPV6
--enable-v4-mapped | 80 | 80
--disable-v4-mapped | can't happen | 127.0.
On Tue, 2004-02-17 at 14:52 -0800, Stas Bekman wrote:
> Philippe M. Chiasson wrote:
> [...]
> >>>Ideally, to fix this once and for all, we need to determine 2 things:
> >>>
> >>>1. The availability of IPv6 on that box
> >>>2. Wether httpd was compiled with --enable-v4-mapped or not (or what it
> >>
Philippe M. Chiasson wrote:
[...]
Ideally, to fix this once and for all, we need to determine 2 things:
1. The availability of IPv6 on that box
2. Wether httpd was compiled with --enable-v4-mapped or not (or what it
defaulted to)
Well, if we can figure out (2), then 1 can be skipped. If someone bu
Hello again,
On Tue, 17 Feb 2004, Garth Webb wrote:
> Right now I think I might try to convert a select few of our most hit
> scripts into handlers to see if some performance can be gained.
> ...
> during high load days our 3 servers really break a sweat as it is.
Could be worth mentioning that
On Tue, 2004-02-17 at 12:58, Ged Haywood wrote:
[snip]
> I don't think I can add much to what Perrin has said. If you're up
> against it because you've walked into a heap of Perl scripts that
> grew like Topsy, you probably don't want to spend the time and take
> the risk of making wholesale chang
Hi there,
On Tue, 17 Feb 2004, Garth Webb wrote:
> (Ged, Sorry for the off-list response)
Apology accepted. :) Actually for some reason it found its way to
my backup mail exchanger so it sat there a while unnoticed.
But this thread's not OT at all. Quite the reverse, it addresses an
important
On Tue, 2004-02-17 at 12:27 -0800, Stas Bekman wrote:
> Philippe M. Chiasson wrote:
> > On Fri, 2004-02-13 at 15:51 -0800, Stas Bekman wrote:
> >
> >>Philippe M. Chiasson wrote:
> >>
> >>>On Thu, 2004-02-12 at 10:24 -0800, Stas Bekman wrote:
> >>>[...]
> > [...]
> >
> > Ideally, to fix this once
Philippe M. Chiasson wrote:
On Fri, 2004-02-13 at 15:51 -0800, Stas Bekman wrote:
Philippe M. Chiasson wrote:
On Thu, 2004-02-12 at 10:24 -0800, Stas Bekman wrote:
[...]
Configuring httpd with --enable-v4-mapped will make it all work, but
it's not the default, so most people on those BSDs are get
On Tue, 2004-02-17 at 14:07, Garth Webb wrote:
> So my question is, what do you think is the better alternative to
> Apache::Registry?
There is nothing terribly wrong with Apache::Registry. The main issue
is that it is emulating a CGI environment to provide backwards
compatibility, and there's no
On Tue, 2004-02-17 at 14:22, David Emery wrote:
> You might be looking for something more like this:
>
> http://daemoninc.com/PersistentPerl/
> http://search.cpan.org/~horrocks/PersistentPerl-2.22/
>
> I don't know if it's necessarily *better* than Apache::Registry, but I
> think in your situatio
Garth Webb wrote:
> So my question is, what do you think is the better alternative to
> Apache::Registry? If its bad enough that someone like me might have
> written a replacement, where is it? Do people really have conf files
> with 100's of directives? It seems to me that most people
> these
On Sat, 2004-02-14 at 09:32, Ged Haywood wrote:
> Hi there,
>
> On Fri, 13 Feb 2004, Garth Webb wrote:
>
> > So what is a good alternative to Apache::Registry? My impression was
> > that this is the thing to use unless you want the extra functionality of
> > something like HTML::Mason.
>
> I'm
On Fri, 2004-02-13 at 15:51 -0800, Stas Bekman wrote:
> Philippe M. Chiasson wrote:
> > On Thu, 2004-02-12 at 10:24 -0800, Stas Bekman wrote:
> > [...]
> > Configuring httpd with --enable-v4-mapped will make it all work, but
> > it's not the default, so most people on those BSDs are getting an http
Roman Bessyadovskii wrote:
su-2.04$ nm /usr/lib/libperl.so.3 | grep vmess
/usr/libexec/elf/nm: /usr/lib/libperl.so.3: no symbols
su-2.04$ nm /usr/lib/libperl_p.a | grep vmess
su-2.04$ nm /usr/local/lib/perl5/5.8.3/i386-freebsd/CORE/libperl.so | grep
vmess
00064168 T Perl_vmess
I try to replace libp
16 matches
Mail list logo
