When I call update_mtime I seem to get set_etags done automatically as
well (or perhaps it's set_last_modified that does it?). This is
*BAD*. It's also not documented anywhere I can find online or in
_Writing Apache Modules with Perl and C_. (Apache 1.3.22, mod_perl
1.26).
This comes up in the
petersm wrote:
Stas Bekman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote
Please read the mailing list Guidelines before posting.
with the link to
http://perl.apache.org/maillist/email-etiquette.html
Do you suggest another direct link like so:
Reporting bugs: http://perl.apache.org/bugs/
Mail list info: http://p
Stas Bekman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote
>Please read the mailing list Guidelines before posting.
>
> with the link to
>
> http://perl.apache.org/maillist/email-etiquette.html
>
> Do you suggest another direct link like so:
>
> Reporting bugs: http://perl.apache.org/bugs/
> Mail list info: htt
[change the subject, split the thread off the other thread]
petersm wrote:
>>May be we should add a new item to the 'short cuts' menu at perl.apache.org:
>>'Maillist Guidelines' pointing to the above url.
>
>
> Or maybe it should be added to the list of links that appears down on the
> bottom of
Stas Bekman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote
> Ged Haywood wrote:
>
> >>How would they know that they aren't being answered because they posted
> >>the question or the followup the way they do it 100 times a day?
> >
> > By reading
> >
> > http://perl.apache.org/maillist/email-etiquette.html#Replying_
Ged Haywood wrote:
How would they know that they aren't being answered because they posted
the question or the followup the way they do it 100 times a day?
By reading
http://perl.apache.org/maillist/email-etiquette.html#Replying_to_posts
How would they know that they aren't being answered becau
Maybe this time ... Stas i send you a copy with another mail, that is not in the list
so i
can't send (i've proved) to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I'm doing tests, these are my results:
- Without a section in httpd.conf, most of sites i
I resend the mail, as mixmail.com is not the best free mail out there (since
was bought by ya.com it's a disaster) now i send from my mail-job, i wish
mails will be better.
I'm doing tests, these are my results:
- Without a sect
Hi Stas,
On Tue, 20 Jan 2004, Stas Bekman wrote:
> How would they know that they aren't being answered because they posted
> the question or the followup the way they do it 100 times a day?
By reading
http://perl.apache.org/maillist/email-etiquette.html#Replying_to_posts
73,
Ged.
--
Reporti
Ged Haywood wrote:
what would it take for people to play nice on this list and truncate those
silly quote-the-whole-thread at the bottom mess/waste?
Just don't answer them.
You are being funny, Ged. How would they know that they aren't being answered
because they posted the question or the fol
Hi Stas,
On Tue, 20 Jan 2004, Stas Bekman wrote:
> what would it take for people to play nice on this list and truncate those
> silly quote-the-whole-thread at the bottom mess/waste?
Just don't answer them.
73,
Ged.
--
Reporting bugs: http://perl.apache.org/bugs/
Mail list info: http://per
Philippe M. Chiasson wrote:
[...]
You mean you have moved the contents of that section to a perl file and
expect it to work? It has no idea what %main::Location is. It needs to be in
the special Apache::ReadConfig namespace. like:
$Apache::ReadConfig::Location{
though I think Philippe ha
what would it take for people to play nice on this list and truncate those
silly quote-the-whole-thread at the bottom mess/waste? :( Think about those
people who are going to reuse the archives. And it can be you at some point.
Please truncate! Thanks.
__
I'm doing tests, these are my results:
- Without a section in httpd.conf, most of sites i have (in localhost) do not work
(message: Forbidden), but there is one that yes it does.
This site is different from all the others, it doesn'
gerard uolaquetalestem wrote:
I've tested what you've said (Stas) and ... it worked!! yes, the "commas" were necessary,
Good ;) s/commas/quotes/
__
Stas BekmanJAm_pH --> Just Another mod_perl Hacker
http://stason.org/
Forget last mail, it's false (and i still have not found the solution), sorry for last
mail then :)
-
Ya.com ADSL:¡PROMOCIÓN! Router 3Com Wireless 11g + 1 Mes + Alta ¡Gratis!
http://acceso.ya.com/adsl/256router/
No te pierdas tu futuro... está en nuestro http://rappelweb.mujeractual.com/ti
I've tested what you've said (Stas) and ... it worked!! yes, the "commas" were
necessary,
okay, then i have emotionated myself and i have taken all the sections to my .pl
archive
and ... it has not worked!!! arg!! uggg!!!
But after spending my evening (another day without gym) i've foun
On Tue, 2004-01-20 at 11:35, Eric J. Hansen wrote:
> Along these lines, can one still use $PerlConfig and @PerlConfig to store
> Apache-style configuration directives? (from within .. blocks,
> or alternatively from within a PerlRequire'd file?)
Yes, they are still supported but will most likely
Along these lines, can one still use $PerlConfig and @PerlConfig to store
Apache-style configuration directives? (from within .. blocks,
or alternatively from within a PerlRequire'd file?)
thanks
Eric
> -Original Message-
> From: Philippe M. Chiasson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent:
On Sat, 2004-01-17 at 15:55, Stas Bekman wrote:
> gerard uolaquetalestem wrote:
> > You were right, now i have this that works
> >
> > PerlModule Apache2
> > ---
> >
> > $Location{'~ .*log$'} = {
> > SetHandler => "perl-script",
> > PerlResponseHandler => "
20 matches
Mail list logo
