Re: [mp1] modules not shared across children. preloading or fork()issue?

2004-01-07 Thread Stas Bekman
Daniel Wilson wrote: Problem solved. Turned out to be some kernel patches redhat has applyed to their kernel. It works fine with a vanilla kernel, litteraly all memory is reported as being shared between apache processes now like it was before. Great. May be you could do a great service to your fel

[mp2) mp1.99_12 fails 9/18 in apache_file.t

2004-01-07 Thread Jay R. Ashworth
from .tgz on 2.0.48 from src on RH7.3: -8<-- Start Bug Report 8<-- 1. Problem Description: mod_perl 1.99_12 fails test, yada yada, see subject line 2. Used Components and their Configuration: *** mod_perl version 1.9912 *** using lib/Apache/BuildConfig

Re: mod_perl + PHP not logging $r->user

2004-01-07 Thread Geoffrey Young
Stuart Jansen wrote: > I'm using Apache 2.0.48, mod_perl 1.99_12, and Apache::AuthCookie to > create a custom authentication scheme. I've noticed that while apache > normally logs the $REMOTE_USER, it doesn't log it when accessing PHP > pages. The pages are still correctly protected. the way th

Re: [mp1] modules not shared across children. preloading or fork()issue?

2004-01-07 Thread Daniel Wilson
Problem solved. Turned out to be some kernel patches redhat has applyed to their kernel. It works fine with a vanilla kernel, litteraly all memory is reported as being shared between apache processes now like it was before. Thanks for your help. Danni - Original Message - From: "Perrin

Re: [mp1] signal handler for USR2 in startup.pl doesn't work

2004-01-07 Thread Gary Denslow
this is working for me.  thanks for the suggestion!   use POSIX;   my $sigset = POSIX::SigSet->new(); my $action = "">    'sigUSR2_handler',    $sigset,    &POSIX::SA_NODEFER,);   POSIX::sigaction(&POSIX::SIGUSR2, $action); sub sigUSR2_handler {    warn "got SIGUSR2\n";}

mod_perl + PHP not logging $r->user

2004-01-07 Thread Stuart Jansen
I'm using Apache 2.0.48, mod_perl 1.99_12, and Apache::AuthCookie to create a custom authentication scheme. I've noticed that while apache normally logs the $REMOTE_USER, it doesn't log it when accessing PHP pages. The pages are still correctly protected. At first I thought $_SERVER["REMOTE_USER"]

Different results using mod_proxy or mod_rewrite vs direct server

2004-01-07 Thread Rafael Caceres
I'm setting up a HTTP/HTPPS reverse proxy server with apache on my DMZ. The proxy will access an internal server (insidelan.server.com) to provide content to outside users. I've attempted using mod_proxy: ServerName insidelan.server.com ProxyPass / http://insidelan.server.com/ ProxyPassRever

Re: running 2 versions of apache and mod perl on the same machine

2004-01-07 Thread Thomas Schindl
That's no problem at all. I'm running on our production server an apache2 on port 80(without mod_perl) with an proxy forward to a mod_perl-apache2 and a mod_perl-apache1. Although in our case mod_perl1 has its own perl because of various reasons. Tom On Wed, 2004-01-07 at 08:27, Malka Cymbalista

Re: running 2 versions of apache and mod perl on the same machine

2004-01-07 Thread Thomas Klausner
Hi! On Wed, Jan 07, 2004 at 09:27:49AM +0200, Malka Cymbalista wrote: > 1. In other words, is it possible to run 2 apache processes on the same > machine, one with apache 2 and mod perl 2, and one with apache 1.3 and > mod perl 1. I know nothing about eprints, but it should be no problem to ha

running 2 versions of apache and mod perl on the same machine

2004-01-07 Thread Malka Cymbalista
We are moving to a new web server and we have installed apache 2.0.48 with mod_perl 1.99_12. We are running perl 5.8.1 on a Sun Solaris machine. One of the applications that we run on our web server is an eprints server which is system for archiving documents. When one compiles eprints, one ess