Stas "Mr. Clever, Helpful & Persistent" Bekman wrote...
> I think I know what your problem is. The failing command includes:
> -L/usr/lib, so it finds /usr/lib/libperl.so.3 instead of
> /usr/local/lib/perl5/5.8.1/i386-freebsd/CORE/libperl.so. I bet
> that if you remove temporary /usr/lib/libperl.
Shannon,
Thank you for getting back to me!
I am running a newer version of apache that only has
the httpd.conf configuration file. The text that I
placed in the file is as follows:
#
# Stuff added by Randy
Brian McCauley wrote:
Stas Bekman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
... I'd keep the "for which"
even if some people consider such strict English grammar to be
affected.
I guess it reads better if using commas:
The easiest and the fastest way to solve the nested subro
Stas Bekman wrote:
Correct - It's not really critical, but I was wondering whether there
was some variable set during the parsing operation that indicated what
was happening. For instance, the section sets up some proxy
cache entries with disk cache enabled, and I check to see that the cache
dir
Cory C. Omand wrote:
On Fri, 2003-10-24 at 10:16, Stas Bekman wrote:
Cory C. Omand wrote:
Cory, when reporting bugs/asking question, please tell us at least what
versions of mp/apache/perl you are using. http://perl.apache.org/bugs/ tells
you everything that you need to supply. Thanks.
Apolog
On Fri, 2003-10-24 at 10:16, Stas Bekman wrote:
> Cory C. Omand wrote:
>
> Cory, when reporting bugs/asking question, please tell us at least what
> versions of mp/apache/perl you are using. http://perl.apache.org/bugs/ tells
> you everything that you need to supply. Thanks.
Apologies -- my con
Cory C. Omand wrote:
Cory, when reporting bugs/asking question, please tell us at least what
versions of mp/apache/perl you are using. http://perl.apache.org/bugs/ tells
you everything that you need to supply. Thanks.
I have a section in my apache configuration file -- when apache
starts up, i
I have a section in my apache configuration file -- when apache
starts up, it prints out some configuration details as it modifies the
configuration. I noticed today while stopping via apachectl for the
first time (rather than restarting) that the Perl section is evaluated
on shutdown as well, wh
Geoffrey Young wrote:
I know, as a newbie to the list,
welcome.
Thanks.
in general, this list is very welcoming to newbies. so, please don't
take what I'm about to say as being directed toward you...
['elements of style' excerpts snipped]
you know, if y'all spent less time squibbling over
I know, as a newbie to the list,
welcome.
in general, this list is very welcoming to newbies. so, please don't take
what I'm about to say as being directed toward you...
['elements of style' excerpts snipped]
you know, if y'all spent less time squibbling over minor grammatical points,
and i
(sorry Brian, this was supposed to go to the list... is there any plan
to fix the reply-to header on this list?)
Brian McCauley wrote:
Stas Bekman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
... I'd keep the "for which"
even if some people consider such strict English grammar to
On Fri, 2003-10-24 at 07:06, harm wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 23, 2003 at 03:19:25PM -0400, Perrin Harkins wrote:
> > On Thu, 2003-10-23 at 14:56, Brendan W. McAdams wrote:
> > > Tried timestamping the second layer, and saving directly, no luck.
> >
> > The timestamp has to be in the first layer. It doe
Stas Bekman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >... I'd keep the "for which"
> > even if some people consider such strict English grammar to be
> > affected.
>
> I guess it reads better if using commas:
>
> The easiest and the fastest way to solve the nested subrou
On Thu, Oct 23, 2003 at 03:19:25PM -0400, Perrin Harkins wrote:
> On Thu, 2003-10-23 at 14:56, Brendan W. McAdams wrote:
> > Tried timestamping the second layer, and saving directly, no luck.
>
> The timestamp has to be in the first layer. It doesn't have to be a
> timestamp, actually. Any write
14 matches
Mail list logo
