Hey,
> Still haven’t made progress with MM multiplexing on OpenWrt except for adding
> support to use the multiplex parameter in the connect args. I’ll post what
> have in case anyone else has the same problem. This should just be an
> incompatibility with the OpenWrt netifd script, right? I
Hey,
Still haven’t made progress with MM multiplexing on OpenWrt except for adding
support to use the multiplex parameter in the connect args. I’ll post what
have in case anyone else has the same problem. This should just be an
incompatibility with the OpenWrt netifd script, right? I am not
Just following up on this because I’m working on adding support to use this on
OpenWrt. I am not sure what the issue is but perhaps it could be an issue with
the MM netifd script on OpenWrt? I passed in the multiplex=$value to the
connectargs then brought up the interface. Everything looks norma
I have tried using ModemManager now with `multiplex=required` in the bearer
options and it connects with 4 QMUX interfaces, netifd assigns the IP address
to the qmimux0 interface, I have a default route via that interface, everything
looks good but... I can’t ping the internet. It looks like ww
I did some testing with this advice and have some results and a couple more
questions.
Bjørn, I realise now you were talking about cdc-mbim. I checked the values for
tx_max and rx_max which are both 16384 by default on my device. I am able to
change rx_max to 31744, which seems to improve upl
Hi Bjørn,
The hardware is a custom IPQ4019-based board with 512MB RAM, irqbalance
running. It’s not the most powerful hardware out there but handles 500 to
700Mbps quite handily with the Quectel stack. In MBIM mode it gets between
200Mbps to 220Mbps. All testing is done over ethernet cable o
Hi,
Using RM500Q-GL with QMI/QMUX can do 1,4Gbps on TCP and UDP without any issues.
Haven’t tried via MM, only direct with QMI/QMUX (qmi_wwan).
-Sebastian
@Mobile
> On 11 Aug 2022, at 09:59, Bjørn Mork wrote:
>
> Nick writes:
>
>> Hey,
>>
>> I am testing a Quectel RM500Q on OpenWrt maste
Nick writes:
> Hey,
>
> I am testing a Quectel RM500Q on OpenWrt master, and have noticed to
> my surprise that the speed is much slower when using the qmi_wwan with
> MM than it is when using qmi_wwan_q and quectel-CM (Quectel’s
> proprietary driver and connection manager).
This is sort of expe
Hey,
I am testing a Quectel RM500Q on OpenWrt master, and have noticed to my
surprise that the speed is much slower when using the qmi_wwan with MM than it
is when using qmi_wwan_q and quectel-CM (Quectel’s proprietary driver and
connection manager). Under good signal conditions the speed tops
