On Sat, Apr 1, 2017 at 5:57 AM, Dan Williams wrote:
>> +MMFlowControl
>> +mm_broadband_modem_get_connected_flow_control (MMBroadbandModem
>> *self)
>> +{
>> +return self->priv->modem_flow_control;
>> +}
>
> This part is kinda icky; and mm-broadband-bearer has no other case of
> calling a mm_br
On Sat, 2017-03-25 at 19:32 +0100, Aleksander Morgado wrote:
> During modem initialization we detected the flow control settings
> supported by the modem, and selected the best one to use from them,
> notifying it to the device via AT+IFC. The device was therefore
> instructed to use that flow cont
Hi Aleksander,
2017-03-25 19:32 GMT+01:00 Aleksander Morgado :
> During modem initialization we detected the flow control settings
> supported by the modem, and selected the best one to use from them,
> notifying it to the device via AT+IFC. The device was therefore
> instructed to use that flow c
During modem initialization we detected the flow control settings
supported by the modem, and selected the best one to use from them,
notifying it to the device via AT+IFC. The device was therefore
instructed to use that flow control setting for data transmission in
the TTY (i.e. not during AT cont
