On Thu, Feb 9, 2017 at 3:54 PM, Piotr Figiel wrote:
> I tested your patch and the reported issue doesn't appear any longer.
> It all looks good and certainly better (more glib-style) than my initial
> implementation. Although I wonder if this doesn't ever collide with
> mm_modem_port_info_array_
Hi Aleksander,
I tested your patch and the reported issue doesn't appear any longer.
It all looks good and certainly better (more glib-style) than my initial
implementation. Although I wonder if this doesn't ever collide with
mm_modem_port_info_array_free() in mm-helper-types.c? It seems that two
So that we don't leak the port names allocated within each
MMModemPortInfo.
==261== 672 bytes in 84 blocks are definitely lost in loss record 7,314 of
7,383
==261== at 0x402C51E: malloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:299)
==261== by 0x4484878: g_malloc (gmem.c:94)
==261== by 0x449D51D: g_st
