[Mjpeg-users] Problems running lavrec

2007-12-22 Thread Peter Chant
I'm having issues that it uses far too much disk space when saving to raw video and I'm having issues when it saves to a compressed format with it maxing the CPU and eventually failing. Suggestions appreciated. Pet

Re: [Mjpeg-users] Problems running lavrec

2007-12-22 Thread Peter Chant
; This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft > Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005. > http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse012070mrt/direct/01/ > ___ > Mjpeg-users mailing list > Mjpeg-users@lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.so

Re: [Mjpeg-users] Problems running lavrec

2007-12-23 Thread Peter Chant
crosoft(R) Visual Studio 2005. > http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse012070mrt/direct/01/ > ___ > Mjpeg-users mailing list > Mjpeg-users@lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mjpeg

[Mjpeg-users] Good intermediate format to use

2009-01-17 Thread Peter Chant
g community.  I've passed some home camcorder video taken in relatively low light through mjpegtools and it looks great played back on my TV - I've managed to get rid of a lot of the noise that was obvious on the raw video. Pete -- Pet

Re: [Mjpeg-users] Good intermediate format to use

2009-01-20 Thread Peter Chant
On Sunday 18 January 2009, Bernhard Praschinger wrote: > Hallo > > Peter Chant wrote: > > Any suggestions of a video file format to use whilst undergoing the > > editing process after having passed video through mjpegtools? I know a > > raw format is ideal, but I

Re: [Mjpeg-users] Good intermediate format to use

2009-01-23 Thread Peter Chant
notice much. If you wath them > on a new Set where you have HDMI (or any other digital transmition I > think you will notice it. Normal standard definition TV. I don't think the basic quality of the source material merits me getting too excited. That said, as I posted earlier, m