Re: [Mjpeg-users] bugs in mjpegtools-1.9.0rc2

2007-05-09 Thread Petr Cerny
Bernhard Praschinger wrote: > Hallo > > I have got a bug report from Petr, he found in the mjpegtools RC2. > > The patches look ok for me > > Here is his mail: > I tried to compile the RC2 and encountered the following problems: > > 2) mjpegtools-1.9.0rc2/utils/cpu_accel.c:364,368: > implic

Re: [Mjpeg-users] Reply to "lavrec records blank"

2007-05-09 Thread Bernhard Praschinger
Hallo > Thank you for your help. I tried your suggestion of -i n:0 but same > result, blank record without error. You asked what input on the bt8x8 card > I'm capturing from - the answer is composite. xawtv picks up image or > video played on the camera OK indicating use of composite1, overlay mod

Re: [Mjpeg-users] Standards converter?

2007-05-09 Thread Stefan M. Fendt
Am Mittwoch, den 09.05.2007, 16:08 +1000 schrieb Mark Heath: > By the way, which frame rate converter is considered the *best* at > the moment? Motion compensated is the only one which makes sense: These are the needed steps (and they allready can be done with the mjpeg-tools...) 1. deinterla

Re: [Mjpeg-users] Reply to "lavrec records blank"

2007-05-09 Thread Stefan M. Fendt
Erm, just a tip. If you must use a BTTV-card for capturing (you really should look for some other solution if you do captures on a regular basis...) you must be aware of an intensional(!) bug inside the driver: YUV 4:2:0 is broken with BTTV-cards. YUV 4:2:0 doesn't retain correct interlacing on BT

Re: [Mjpeg-users] bugs in mjpegtools-1.9.0rc2

2007-05-09 Thread Steven M. Schultz
On Wed, 9 May 2007, Petr Cerny wrote: > > missing #include > > If you don't like malloc.h, probably posix_memalign() could be of use. If you look more closely at the code you will see that the reference to memalign() (for which malloc.h is needed) is in the posix_memal