> > I thus suggest that we change
> > printk(KERN_INFO "%s: " __func__ " - blabla ", zr->name);
> > to
> > printk(KERN_INFO "%s: %s - blabla ", zr->name, __func__ );
> > which would work for both gcc-2.95 and gcc-3.2, and be in accordance
> > with the C99 standard.
>
> Sounds good, let's do that. A
Hi Laurent,
On Fri, 2003-01-10 at 10:45, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hi Ronald,\"Note that these semantics are deprecated, and that GCC 3.2
> will handle __FUNCTION__ and __PRETTY_FUNCTION__ the same way as
> __func__. __func__ is defined by th! e ISO standard C99.\"
[..]
> I thus suggest that we c
Hi Ronald,> Or require users to do this manually (card=X insmod> option)... Anyway, that option isn't finished yet. Didn't> work on it the past few days (school started again).Ah. School... *grin* :-)Well, actually, I wish I had as much free time now as when I was at school :-)> It's actually a gcc
