Re: [Mjpeg-users] Re: --reduce-hf question

2003-03-13 Thread scholnik
For me, scalers are only an occasional diversion from my daily grind For what it's worth, a 'blur factor' option is on my list of things to add to y4mscaler; I imagine it would simply scale the size of the kernel to lower the spatial cut-off frequency. Right

Re: [Mjpeg-users] Re: --reduce-hf question

2003-03-13 Thread Matto Marjanovic
> You hit the nail on the head on this one. I build scalers > (and hence pre and reconstruction filters) for my job. Quite > apart from my normal struggle just to halfways find time to > properly develop mpeg2enc this means that I can't easily do > this for the proj

Re: [Mjpeg-users] Re: --reduce-hf question

2003-03-13 Thread scholnik
--reduce-hf doesn't actually throw away the higher frequency DCT bins. What it does is simply increase their quantisation (which of course means more low-amplitude ones get 0-ed). Is it easy to make the amount of the increase and the transition adjustable? To give yet ano

Re: [Mjpeg-users] Re: --reduce-hf question

2003-03-13 Thread Steven M. Schultz
Hi Andrew - > quantisation matrix for each DCT that you can specify in each picture > coding sequence. However, a well-known trick is to selectively 0 > isolated bins (they have a high coding overhead) you think won't reduced SNR Is this the "single coefficient elimination" that is use

Re: [Mjpeg-users] Re: --reduce-hf question

2003-03-13 Thread Andrew Stevens
Hi Dan, > I think extent of the ringing artifacts depend on the source images > being encoded. If the spatial bandwidth of the signal hitting > mpeg2enc has already been limited (by camera optics, preprocessing, > etc) then at higher spatial frequencies the spectrum will already roll > off, and w