Re: [Mjpeg-users] Re: [Mjpeg-developer] Yay! Another scaler: y4mscaler

2002-12-24 Thread Matto Marjanovic
>awds59.6-> smil2yuv bugs8.smil | od -c | head >000Y U V 4 M P E G 2 W 7 2 0 H >0204 8 0 F 3 0 0 0 0 : 1 0 0 1 >040I b A 5 9 : 5 4 \n F R A M E \n Just a note that might c

Re: [Mjpeg-users] Re: [Mjpeg-developer] Yay! Another scaler: y4mscaler

2002-12-24 Thread Matto Marjanovic
>> How did you get a source stream with 480 lines and NTSC framerate, >> but with PAL sample aspect ratio (59:54) ?? > > You know - that caught my eye too - it didn't feel right (should be > 11:10, right?). Yep. (Well, 10:11 actually.) And this is what triggered the segfault prob

Re: [Mjpeg-users] Re: [Mjpeg-developer] Yay! Another scaler: y4mscaler

2002-12-24 Thread Steven M. Schultz
From: Matto Marjanovic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Hey, Steve, out of curiousity, > > How did you get a source stream with 480 lines and NTSC framerate, > but with PAL sample aspect ratio (59:54) ?? with 'dvgrab' via a Canopus ADVC-100 - and then run smil2yuv and out pops 59:54

Re: [Mjpeg-users] Re: [Mjpeg-developer] Yay! Another scaler: y4mscaler

2002-12-24 Thread Steven M. Schultz
> From: Matto Marjanovic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Hey, Steve, out of curiousity, > > >smil2yuv bugs8.smil | \ > >y4mscaler -I active=696x468+12+4 -O sar=1:1 -O size=640x480 -S option=cubic | >yuvplay > > > > INFO: [y4mscaler] Input Stream Header: > > INFO: [y4mscaler] <<< frame size:

Re: [Mjpeg-users] Re: [Mjpeg-developer] Yay! Another scaler: y4mscaler

2002-12-24 Thread Matto Marjanovic
Hey, Steve, out of curiousity, >smil2yuv bugs8.smil | \ >y4mscaler -I active=696x468+12+4 -O sar=1:1 -O size=640x480 -S option=cubic | yuvplay > > INFO: [y4mscaler] Input Stream Header: > INFO: [y4mscaler] <<< frame size: 720x480 pixels (518400 bytes) > INFO: [y4mscaler] <<< fra

Re: [Mjpeg-users] Re: [Mjpeg-developer] Yay! Another scaler: y4mscaler

2002-12-24 Thread Steven M. Schultz
Hi! > From: Matto Marjanovic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Yay! *Two* users And, you'll notice, two bugs - I sense a pattern :-) > >here. Seems setting optind to 0 isn't the right thing: > > "That would be a bug, Bob." ^Bob^Steve^ > It should be 1; I guess my

Re: [Mjpeg-users] Re: [Mjpeg-developer] Yay! Another scaler: y4mscaler

2002-12-24 Thread Matto Marjanovic
Yay! *Two* users > One small patch though is what I needed for getopt() on the systems > here. Seems setting optind to 0 isn't the right thing: "That would be a bug, Bob." It should be 1; I guess my system is more forgiving. (Debian Unstable, with gcc-2.95.4 and glibc-2.3.1.