HI!
Steven M. Schultz wrote:
A lower -q (2 or 3) gets me higher file sizes, so shouldn't it also be
potentially better quality?
Yes, it will give better quality. That may or may not be visible :)
I have a problem with -q 2 and 3. See seperate thread.
Ah, it's letterboxed so you have
On Wed, 21 Jan 2004, [ISO-8859-1] Thomas Börkel wrote:
> In the mjpegtools HowTo, I read that a quality factor below 4 is not
> recommended (= not necessary?). Is this still true?
Yes, it's still true - but it is a guide/hint and not a firm rule
or prohibition. The risk is, wi
On Wed, Jan 21, 2004 at 02:00:22PM +0100, Thomas B?rkel wrote:
> A lower -q (2 or 3) gets me higher file sizes, so shouldn't it also be
> potentially better quality?
Provided you don't hit your maximum bit-rate limit (-b 4000) that you've
chosen, yes.
> I want to encode about 43 minutes of vide
