hi!
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Here's a script I've used - I use ssh only to set up "hose" on the
> other machine, and both machines share a common filesystem over NFS.
> Here yuv4mpeg2 data flows over the netpipe, and the (much smaller)
> mpeg2 data flows back over NFS.
I was thinking o
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> I use netpipes instead of rsh, but either way the network shouldn't be
I gave netpipes a try - worked "ok" but I couldn't find a way
to pass parameters thru to the remote process. Easy to set up
a shell
Hi -
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> I use netpipes instead of rsh, but either way the network shouldn't be
I gave netpipes a try - worked "ok" but I couldn't find a way
to pass parameters thru to the remote process. Easy to set up
a shell script of course.
> much of a bott
Hallo
> Question is, has anyone tried to "rsh" some jobs out to other
> computers (e.g. on a 100Mb ethernet) to try to shorten the time,
> or would that just mean the network becomes the bottleneck?
>
> I use netpipes instead of rsh, but either way the network shouldn't
Question is, has anyone tried to "rsh" some jobs out to other
computers (e.g. on a 100Mb ethernet) to try to shorten the time,
or would that just mean the network becomes the bottleneck?
I use netpipes instead of rsh, but either way the network shouldn't be
much of a bo
