Am Dienstag 06 Dezember 2005 08.29 schrieb Stefan M. Fendt:
> Steven M. Schultz schrieb:
>
> > I do NOT think it's a good idea. Upscaling ~20-30% (depending if you're
> >
> >in a NTSC or PAL area) degrades the quality so much I couldn't watch
> >it (yes - I've done it and didn't like the results
Hi -
On Tue, 6 Dec 2005, Stefan M. Fendt wrote:
> Well, I think this heavily depends on the used scaler (and on the one
> watching the result :)... I know an upscaling method which is
Ok - I can agree with that ;)
For casual viewing the results could be adequate. There's also
dread... I missed that one...
Steven M. Schultz schrieb:
> The data is already 'broadcast legal' (well, it _should_ be if the
>
>
I *never* have seen a TV-Station (at least here in PAL-Land...)
transmitting a fully "broadcast legal" signal. Nearly everything I know
is at least transmitte
Steven M. Schultz schrieb:
> I do NOT think it's a good idea. Upscaling ~20-30% (depending if you're
>
>in a NTSC or PAL area) degrades the quality so much I couldn't watch
>it (yes - I've done it and didn't like the results ;)).
>
>
>
Well, I think this heavily depends on the used scaler (and
Am Dienstag 06 Dezember 2005 04.34 schrieb Steven M. Schultz:
>
> On Mon, 5 Dec 2005, Michael Hanke wrote:
>
> > I have some material which is widescreen in letter box format. Since the
> > quality is rather high (Digital Satellite --> SVHS-cable --> (re)digitize)
I
> > am thinking of transfor
On Mon, 5 Dec 2005, Michael Hanke wrote:
> I have some material which is widescreen in letter box format. Since the
> quality is rather high (Digital Satellite --> SVHS-cable --> (re)digitize) I
> am thinking of transforming the picture to DVD_WIDE (720x576 and 16:9). My
> question: is this a
Hallo,
I have some material which is widescreen in letter box format. Since the
quality is rather high (Digital Satellite --> SVHS-cable --> (re)digitize) I
am thinking of transforming the picture to DVD_WIDE (720x576 and 16:9). My
question: is this a good idea or should I rely on the TV-set to
