Re: [Mjpeg-users] mpeg2enc -M and quality

2009-10-03 Thread Christian Ebert
* Steven M. Schultz on Friday, October 02, 2009 at 15:50:41 -0700 > On Fri, 2 Oct 2009, Christian Ebert wrote: >> Has bumping up the -M option a negative effect on quality? > > No. But it also doesn't improve the encoding speed as much as > people would prefer. There are enough serialisation poi

Re: [Mjpeg-users] mpeg2enc -M and quality (was: Converting vnc session to a movie file)

2009-10-02 Thread Steven M. Schultz
On Fri, 2 Oct 2009, Christian Ebert wrote: > Hi, > > [ sorry for half-hijacking the thread ] > > > If you only have one CPU/Core you don't even need mpeg2enc's -M 2 > > option. The only thing that might help you than is the buffer program > > for buffering the I/O. The mjpegtools with the pip

[Mjpeg-users] mpeg2enc -M and quality (was: Converting vnc session to a movie file)

2009-10-02 Thread Christian Ebert
Hi, [ sorry for half-hijacking the thread ] * Bernhard Praschinger on Friday, October 02, 2009 at 18:05:49 +0200 > Nagalenoj H. wrote: >> Mine is not dual core or more.. And that command(time with each command >> in pipe) doesn't work. I don't how I am going to reduce the conversion >> duration