Michael Hanke schrieb:
> Do you have more ideas?
>
probably not really ... Here is what I would do for a start:
1. Divide the frame (the two fields...) into 5 regions: Top-left,
Top-right, Bottom-left, Bottom-right, Center. Let all these
regions be blocks of 1/5th of the image-si
Am Donnerstag, 9. November 2006 00:51 schrieb stefan:
> > You might try putting the data thru the new and improved deinterlacer
> > and creating a progressive stream. Maybe that will 'blend' the two
> > fields together into a more stable image.
>
> I fear that this will not help much,
> You might try putting the data thru the new and improved deinterlacer
> and creating a progressive stream. Maybe that will 'blend' the two
> fields together into a more stable image.
>
I fear that this will not help much, as the new deinterlacer core really
needs motion fo
On Wed, 8 Nov 2006, Michael Hanke wrote:
> I have another capturing problem with very old VHS tapes. I am using a Canopus
> ADVC-55 for capturing to PAL-DV. Even if my tapes are very old, I do not have
> any problem with lost frames, drops outs etc. My problem seems to be a
That is beca
Hi,
I have another capturing problem with very old VHS tapes. I am using a Canopus
ADVC-55 for capturing to PAL-DV. Even if my tapes are very old, I do not have
any problem with lost frames, drops outs etc. My problem seems to be a
synchronization issue of the individual scan lines. In some fra