On Wed, Sep 22, 2004 at 04:04:02PM -0600, James Bigler wrote:
> This was suspicious as the original source images are fine. I even did:
>
> convert nocrack.00{6,6,6,6,6,6,6,6,6,6}0.ppm nocrack.0* crack.0*
> -thumbnail '640x512>' -bordercolor black -border 50 -gravity center
> -crop 640x512+0+0
On Wed, 22 Sep 2004, James Bigler wrote:
> I couldn't think of another way to describe it. The image in the video
> erroneously glitches. An example can be found in some temporary web
Ah, not that I know what it means - I just never thought of it
as "popping" ;) "Jerk" or "
This was suspicious as the original source images are fine. I even did:
convert nocrack.00{6,6,6,6,6,6,6,6,6,6}0.ppm nocrack.0* crack.0*
-thumbnail '640x512>' -bordercolor black -border 50 -gravity center
-crop 640x512+0+0 ppm:- | ppmtoy4m -F 25:1 -r -n 150 > frames.raw
cat frames.raw | y4mtopp
2. I don't like popping. I've noticed that depending on various
parameters I've chosen for mpeg2enc I get intermittent popping.
"popping" is not a term usually associated with video. When I have
heard the word "popping" used it's been in the context of audio as
in "clicks and pops" or "chir
On Wed, 22 Sep 2004, James Bigler wrote:
> 2. I don't like popping. I've noticed that depending on various
> parameters I've chosen for mpeg2enc I get intermittent popping.
"popping" is not a term usually associated with video. When I have
heard the word "popping" used it's b
I have a series of computer generated images (i.e. not photographic)
that I generated using time varying data, and I would like to create an
MPEG-1 movie of the slices.
I've played around with a lot of the parameters, and would like some
help in getting the optimal set.
I don't care about file
