Re: [Mjpeg-users] ADVC-100 vs ADVC-300

2004-09-25 Thread Roberto Salles
On Thu, 23 Sep 2004 20:04:59 -0700 (PDT) "Steven M. Schultz" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: [...] > Ah, so if you have found a _local_ place that will sell the > Canopus device then that means they should work with PAL-M. [...] Imported. Not that kind of "local"... wish it were. Canopus

[Mjpeg-users] ADVC-100 vs ADVC-300

2004-09-23 Thread Roberto Salles
Hello! Sorry to be sending this e-mail to you but I think you can answer some questions to me. It's quite a while I don't write anything on the mjpeg list and I remember there was a person that would really make good coments about the Canopus capture devices. After years, now I'm working and I

Re: [Mjpeg-users] 29.97fps vs 23.976fps

2003-02-04 Thread Roberto Salles
Hi all! > > My sources are usually from japanese animation, so I really > > don't care about many frames because very few (if there are > > any) will need 29.97fps. Just to make an example, not with > > unusual parameters(considering the defaults as base) I made fit > > on a 80min CD 1h21m49

[Mjpeg-users] 29.97fps vs 23.976fps

2003-02-04 Thread Roberto Salles
Hello, mjpeg team and list! I've been using the tools for quite a while (in fact even need to upgrade the version - I'm using the 1.6.0) but there's a point I don't remember seen discussed here and in other places and I want just to be sure of it. I've encoded from many sources, some 29.97fps