> That's what I thought. So basically, if I understand you correctly
> the only application of such a lossless re-encoding would be to
> do a sort of "injection" of additional video material into an existing
> DV frame.
That's for sub-frame re-encoding. Yes, I'm not sure how much of a
benefit it
> What do you have in mind when you say lossless re-encoding ?
If a frame has already been passed through a DV codec, then it is
(theoretically) possible to re-encode it with no quality loss, by
using the exact same bitstream. This is desirable for video editing
systems where you might end up re-e
Hi guys - I've some done work on ffmpeg's DV codec recently, on
contract for some of my clients. Quality-wise, the video encoder
should be competitive with popular commerical encoders. In some of my
benchmarks it attains higher image quality than Apple's software
encoder. Which is not to say it is
