Re: [Mjpeg-users] only two --yuv stream concatenations?

2004-02-03 Thread Steven M. Schultz
On Wed, 4 Feb 2004, Dragon_at_work wrote: > Your scripting is a much better idea! I came up with that approach a long time ago when sections of a long capture needed different y4mshift parameters. > > read junk > Does junk refer to stdio in this case? To "stdin" to be p

[Mjpeg-users] only two --yuv stream concatenations?

2004-02-03 Thread Dragon_at_work
Thanks to Steven Schultz, for his former advise. My myriad of photographs can now be made into a VCD and posted home. Running into a bit of a problem merging y4m files together. For some reason I can only merge two using the 'Schultz Method' of CATing the y4m files. Here is my basic schema:

Re: [Mjpeg-users] only two --yuv stream concatenations?

2004-02-03 Thread Dragon_at_work
On Wednesday 04 February 2004 12:30, Steven M. Schultz wrote: > I see nothing in that proceedure that removes the YUV4MPEG2 header > bits. How are you doing that? I didn't show that. Not being as clever as you, I wrote a subroutine in C to do it. Your scripting is a much better idea

Re: [Mjpeg-users] only two --yuv stream concatenations?

2004-02-03 Thread Steven M. Schultz
On Wed, 4 Feb 2004, Dragon_at_work wrote: > Running into a bit of a problem merging y4m files together. > > Here is my basic schema: > > lav2yuv +n file_1.avi | yuvfps -v 0 -r 25:1 | yuvscaler -v O -O SVCD > > file_1.y4m > lav2yuv +n file_2.avi | yuvfps -v 0 -r 25:1 | yuvscaler -v O -O SVC

[Mjpeg-users] only two --yuv stream concatenations?

2004-02-03 Thread Dragon_at_work
Thanks to Steven Schultz, for his former advise. My myriad of photographs can now be made into a VCD and posted home. Running into a bit of a problem merging y4m files together. For some reason I can only merge two using the 'Schultz Method' of CATing the y4m files. Here is my basic schema:

Re: [Mjpeg-users] Bug report: segv in jpeg2yuv (from 1.6.1-93)

2004-02-03 Thread Bernhard Praschinger
Hallo > I'm not substribed to the users list, as I'm not a user of mjpegtools. > I've just > tried to use them once and the result was this bug, which I'm reporting > (and will then uninstall them and find something that works). If you think the mjpegtool's don't work you have to look for somethin

[Mjpeg-users] mjpegtools 1.6.2 released!

2004-02-03 Thread Ronald Bultje
Dear all, it's my pleasure to announce the official release of mjpegtools 1.6.2. This version features all your well-known tools (MPEG/DVD encoding, MJPEG editing/recording, many video filters, etc.) with a shiny new version number and many new features, bug fixes, improvements and all other thing