On Fri, May 24, 2013 at 06:48:05PM -0400, Patrick Mc(avery wrote:
> I tried to load Fluxbox and was disappointed with it. It had several
> menubuttons for application that were not yet installed.
There is more than just Fluxbox out there. That's UNIX world, it
is up to you and you have plenty of
Hello,
there are a lot of nice window managers in OpenBSD base (fvwm, cwm, ...).
I am a big fan of dwm and I think it shares the philosophy of minimalism
which is important to a lot of BSD lovers. Also, it has a good code
quality and is rock solid...
Is there a reason why dwm isnt in OpenBSD
On Wed, Jul 11, 2012 at 10:38:39AM +0200, Matthieu Herrb wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 10, 2012 at 08:52:14PM +, z...@sdf.org wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > there are a lot of nice window managers in OpenBSD base (fvwm, cwm, ...).
> >
> > I am a big fan of dwm and I think it shares the philosophy of mini
On Fri, Jul 20, 2012 at 07:29:03PM +0200, Alessandro Baggi wrote:
> There is someone that has started obsd on kvm and avoid this problem?
>
> This problem is kvm related?
>
> Another, someone has tried obsd 5.1 on ESX?
I am running OpenBSD 5.1 and a bunch of NetBSD guests with kvm and
everythin
> git sucks. mercurial ruleZ, i want a mercurial mirror.
> And python in base... and some icecream.
>
python and mercurial sucks both. Both have nothing to do with true UNIX
heritage. Use Ubuntu
What solution should be used for traffic shaping on real-life, "production"
gateways with tens and hundreds users? PF queues seem to be too
"userspace"-ish and CPU consuming.
For example, in FreeBSD there is "slow" pf in userspace and "fast"
kernel-level netgraph.
2011/11/1 Gregory Edigarov
> On Tue, 1 Nov 2011 11:17:56 +0400
> ZZ Wave wrote:
>
> > What solution should be used for traffic shaping on real-life,
> > "pro
Hi, i am goin to set up cvsup/anoncvs/cvsync server, but don't knwo how. Can
you help me with configuration of these
*cvs* servers? I have already write an e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], but w/o any
answer. Thanks for help.
8 matches
Mail list logo
