Just a quick check to see if anyone is anyone working on this yet..
I can give a hand if someone is already working on it, otherwise I'm going
to take a run at it.
On Oct 13, 2014 10:40 PM, "Patrik Lundin"
wrote:
>
> On Sat, Sep 13, 2014 at 02:39:04AM +0200, Patrik Lundin wrote:
> >
> > armani@ has laid the groundwork for this and I recently started
> > contributing to his fork as well.
> >
> > The work-in-progress can be found here:
> > https://github.com/j
On 10/23/07, Lars NoodC)n <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Per-Erik Persson wrote:
> > ... not being able to run inside a
> > virtualized environment is not an option in the future.
>
> Virtualization is available already. See the package qemu.
> http://www.openbsd.org/4.1_packages/
>
> Or are
Giving a path should work (it did on my
/tmp/127.0.0.1-2007-11-26-18:31/ dir I just tested with, and it failed
the same way yours did without the ./ )
scp -r ./127.0.0.1-2007-11-26-18:31 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/u02/snap
On Nov 26, 2007 1:24 PM, Eduardo Alvarenga <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi there,
Not sure if it was gmail that blew chunks on your message or somewhere
else along the way, but it seems some of your message lines were
trunked.
Either way, your attachment won't make it through...
"The only mailing list that allows attachments is the ports list, they
will be removed from messages
On Dec 3, 2007 5:04 AM, ropers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 03/12/2007, L <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I can't find the 'reply only to group' feature my mail client yet.. but
> > I just started using this email client recently. It is Mozilla Thunderbird.
>
> Reply to all.
>
>
Alpine is anothe
On Dec 31, 2007 10:25 AM, Marco Peereboom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Grind them up. There is nothing else you can do to "permanently" wipe
> disks. Residual magnetism is always there provided good enough
> equipment. If your data is that sensitive there is nothing else but the
> grinder.
Some
Heya misc:
Base dhcpd and named are failing to start after an update. I'm really
confused at this point. Other daemons are working fine and I can't see
anything else 'wrong' with the system. Any thoughts at all would be
greatly appreciated.
This was a 4.2-release system. I followed the standard p
Missed the misc@ CC:, sry richard
On Wed, Feb 27, 2008 at 8:26 PM, Richard Daemon
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> For the dhcpd, /etc/dhcpd.interfaces is ok? or try 'dhcpd bge0' ?
Specifiing bge0 on the command line has the same effect:
root:/root:10# dhcpd -df bge0
Can't listen on bge0 - it has
I am running a couple jetway mini-itx c7 boxes with the 3x1Gig
daughter boards running without any problems. I also have a couple
stock via mini-itx boards that have run obsd in the past without
problem also.
On Tue, Mar 11, 2008 at 10:57 AM, Jordi Prats <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi all,
> Ha
Take a quick look in the archives talking about expat. It was in xbase
for the 4.2 release, is moving to base IIRC, and it looks like you
dont have it installed: " > /usr/bin/ld: cannot find -lexpat"
On Tue, Apr 1, 2008 at 8:56 AM, Sunnz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I am not sure what I did wron
What does df -i show? maybe you filled up a disk or ran out of inodes?
On 8/2/07, Timo Schoeler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> hi,
>
> i have an amd64 system running for about six months now flawlessly
> (however, due to following -current, not with uptimes >10 days).
>
> today it crashed twice when
it is highly recommended you cruise the DNS rfcs and/or read the dns
bible.. these are problems solved 20 years ago
On 8/28/07, reje <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> In the sense of expanding DNS infrastructure, your
> comments seem sane enough (you definitely read that
> DNS & BIND book :-)
>
> On th
I have a couple jetway mini-itx boxen I like. There are daughter
boards for these guys, I put a 3x10/100/1000 card in there for 4 nics
total.
Boards: http://www.jetwaycomputer.com/VIA.html
Daughter: http://www.jetwaycomputer.com/Daughter_Board.html
Sample Dealer: http://www.logicsupply.com/
On
On Mon, Oct 5, 2009 at 2:25 PM, Chris wrote:
> Yes, I do run it as an hvm, and I have an AMD/Pacifica compliant chip
> Maybe if you can clarify what you meant by "hardware support"
I think he means running OpenBSD as an hvm guest, not paravirtualized,
which you are.
On Thu, Oct 29, 2009 at 1:16 PM, Joachim Schipper
wrote:
> I believe that work is currently underway to make it possible for
> multiple SSL-enabled hostnames to share a single IP address, but it will
> probably be quite a few years before this is remotely common.
>
There is an tls extension, defi
Try:
set block-policy return
You should get your proper closed messages in nmap
On Fri, Nov 12, 2010 at 13:27, woolsherpahat wrote:
> (please see my in-line comments)
>
> On Fri, Nov 12, 2010 at 12:09 PM, Kenneth Gober wrote:
>> is it this?
>>># redirect external ssh traffic from ?
>>>pass
Dan Kaminsky (http://dankaminsky.com) has been working on "Domain Key
Infrastructure" bootstrapped of of dnssec that looks pretty
interesting. I'm not sure where the video is for this talk (it was at
blackhat/defcon 2010), but I found the slides..
http://www.slideshare.net/dakami/phreebird-suite-10
18 matches
Mail list logo
