Well, I screwed up things by taking a long break from everything and
leaving things on auto-pilot. The company which had earlier bought the
server company I use shut down the server service.
I'm located right now in Washington state in the US.
But I'm also concerned about how much the quacks in po
> Original Message
> Subject: Re: Any advice on a dedicated remote access server
> From: Karsten Horsmann
> Date: Thu, November 23, 2017 12:14 pm
> To: Martin_Schröder
> Cc: OpenBSD general usage list
>
>
> Hi Martin and hello List,
>
> I use an ovh / soyoustart dedicated
It has Windows 10 Home pre-installed.
I am trying to work off of USB flash drive.
BIOS has UEFI or legacy option. I have to use legacy option.
Won't finish booting unless I disable inteldrm
I also allowed the aperture to be set at 2. didn't help.
Boots OK, but it is slow.
And no X. Says no scree
I waited on purpose to make a change back to default X setup.
inteldrm disabled. aperture at 2.
Oddly, I did not get exactly the same response as before.
No xorg.conf
This time it briefly brought up the X background before failing
Xorg.0.log:
[ 577.721] (--) checkDevMem: using aperture drive
I waited on purpose to make a change back to default X setup.
inteldrm disabled. aperture at 2.
Oddly, I did not get exactly the same response as before.
No xorg.conf
This time it briefly brought up the X background before failing
Xorg.0.log:
[ 577.721] (--) checkDevMem: using aperture drive
> Original Message
> Subject: Re: OpenBSD Puffy Stickers
> From: Rupert Gallagher
> Date: Thu, November 30, 2017 1:30 pm
> To: Ingo Schwarze , Jay Williams
> Cc: misc@openbsd.org
>
>
> Don't give up on marketing.
>
Really?
I can count on one hand the number of people since
> Original Message
> Subject: Re: Integrating "safe" languages into OpenBSD?
> From: Nick Holland
> Date: Mon, December 04, 2017 7:45 am
> To: misc@openbsd.org
>
>
> On 12/03/17 20:19, bytevolc...@safe-mail.net wrote:
> > I've always subscribed to the idea that too much safet
> Original Message
> Subject: Re: Integrating "safe" languages into OpenBSD?
> From: Nick Holland
> Date: Mon, December 04, 2017 7:45 am
> To: misc@openbsd.org
>
>
> On 12/03/17 20:19, bytevolc...@safe-mail.net wrote:
> > I've always subscribed to the idea that too much safety
Although I haven't gotten X to properly work, there are some
hardware defects that are serious, as in breaking things and
with usability.
The power card has a round device that reduces certain types
of "noise" in the power. However, they put it to fall directly
underneath the right hand USB port.
Forgive problems with this email.
I saw how my emails showed up on marc.info
Scary. This is just temporary.
OK. I've tried to use both methods and just don't
get true duplication.
tar
It can't work with file and directory names
that are OK in filesystem, but too long for itself.
Quite a while bac
I'm not able to try it right now, but would gtar
accomplish what that our tar doesn't for this?
As in maybe pull something out of it into our tar?
Chris Bennett
>
> 'pax' and 'tar' are actually the same binary so they have the same
> limitation from the file formats that are supported, as well as any purely
> internal limitations. "pax -rw" actually has file format limitations by
> design, so it doesn't automagically free you from those limitations.
>
> Wait, you previously said your problem was with symlinks *permissions* but
> now you're saying *ownership*! I can confirm that restore(8) didn't
> preserve the permissions (thus the patch I sent), but as long as you ran it
> with sufficient privilege it should have always restored symlink
> Original Message
> Subject: What would you like to see in upcoming PF tutorials?
> From: "Peter N. M. Hansteen"
> Date: Thu, December 14, 2017 2:27 pm
> To: misc@openbsd.org
>
>
> We're in the process of preparing for upcoming conferences with updates
> to the ever-in-progr
- Original Message -
From: "Tim Stewart" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2008 9:29 AM
Subject: OpenBSD 4.2 dhcpd(8)
Hello all,
Does anyone know which version of ISC DHCP that OpenBSD 4.2 uses for
dhcpd(8)? I wasn't able to find any clue on the webpage or associa
---Cliquez ici pour ne plus recevoir de newsletter---
[IMAGE]
[IMAGE]
[IMAGE]
[IMAGE]
[IMAGE]
[IMAGE]
314URBANSTORE.COM
Frais de Port Offert ` 150 euro d'achat, Livraison 24/48 heures, CB,
Paypal
SATISFAIT OU REMBOURSE 15 Jours.
Inscris tes Amis, dhs leur 10 Commande, tu gagnes 8 euros
29
web site: blog.sina.com.cn/ecoscooter
we export high quality Electric scooter/motorcycle/bike with
EEC/COC(EU)approval AND DOT(USA/CA)Approval.
You can import to EU Countries,USA/Canada and so on.the price and catalogue in
the attachment.pls check it.
if you are interested in pls reply to EMAIL:
web site: http://blog.sina.com.cn/ecoscooter
Glad to hear that you\'re on the market for E-vehicle.
We specialize in manufacturing high quality Electric scooter,emotorcycle,ebike
for 12 years . models have EEC COC(EU), DOT(USA)Approved.
We\'re the supplier of Wal-mart, and already passed the FE f
web site: http://blog.sina.com.cn/ecoscooter
Glad to hear that you\'re on the market for E-vehicle.
We specialize in manufacturing high quality Electric scooter,emotorcycle,ebike
for 12 years . models have EEC COC(EU), DOT(USA)Approved.
We\'re the supplier of Wal-mart, and already passed the FE f
your email: e-c...@hallmark.com your name: hallmark.com subiect: You have
recieved A Hallmark E-Card.!
Hallmark.comShop OnlineHallmark MagazineE-Cards & MoreAt Gold
Crown
You have recieved A Hallmark E-Card.
Hello!
You have recieved a Hallmark E-Card.
To see it, click here,
There's something
Greetings
I've got a cable modem that forwards ports 80,110,25 to an internal host
(192.168.1.121)
Email (POP and SMTP) is hosted on 192.168.1.121, but recent changes have
forced me to move
the webserver to another machine (192.168.1.126), which means i have to
somehow forward
port 80 traffic
Stefan Kell wrote:
Hello,
On Sat, 23 Feb 2008, elaconta.com Webmaster wrote:
Greetings
...snip...
rdr on $ext_if proto tcp from any to 192.168.1.121 port 80 ->
127.0.0.1 port 5000
...snip
I'm running OpenBSD 3.9 (i386) on both machines.
why not rdr directly to your internal w
Stefan Kell wrote:
Hello,
On Sat, 23 Feb 2008, elaconta.com Webmaster wrote:
Stefan Kell wrote:
Hello,
On Sat, 23 Feb 2008, elaconta.com Webmaster wrote:
Greetings
...snip...
rdr on $ext_if proto tcp from any to 192.168.1.121 port 80 ->
127.0.0.1 port 5000
...snip
I'm running
Stefan Kell wrote:
Hello,
Original-Nachricht
Datum: Sat, 23 Feb 2008 21:29:06 +
Von: "elaconta.com Webmaster" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
An: Stefan Kell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
CC: misc@openbsd.org
Betreff: Re: Web Traffic forwarding, PF and NC
configuration of the Linux box (netstat -r to show
the routes, ifconfig or whatever).
-
Elaconta.com Webmaster
-
wrong?
--
Elaconta.com webmaster
--
Em 7/26/2006, "Spruell, Darren-Perot" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> escreveu:
>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> Now, thing is, the Linux firewall has two NICs:
>>
>> NIC 1: 192.168.1.121
>> NIC 2: 192.168.1.122
>>
packets. All that
is needed is a way for the 3 interfaces in the firewall (2 real, 1
alias) to pass packets between themselves. Wouldn't it work this way?
------
Elaconta.com webmaster
--
Em 7/27/2006, "Stuart Henderson" <[EMAIL PROTE
ve a secure OS running it.
------
Elaconta.com webmaster
--
Em 7/27/2006, "Nick Holland" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> escreveu:
>elaconta.com Webmaster wrote:
>> Howdy
>>
>> We have here an old (Mandrake Linux 8 - yeah i know...) PC with
Matt Radtke escreveu:
> Hello there
>
>
>>> Router (192.168.1.120) <-> (192.168.1.121)
>>>
>> Firewall PC (192.168.1.122)
>>
>>> <-> (192.168.1.0/24) LAN
>>>
>>> Now, thing is, the Linux firewall has two NICs:
>>>
>>> NIC 1: 192.168.1.121
>>> NIC 2: 192.168.1.122
>>>
>>> The two NICs
Dag Richards escreveu:
> Webmaster Elaconta wrote:
>> I'm not looking forward to addressing the router to a different subnet
>> (and i know that would solve the problem) because our Internet-facing
>> servers are connected directly to that router in DMZ fashion (the r
on how to do this successfully? Thanks.
--
Elaconta.com webmaster
--
>
> On 7/29/06, elaconta.com Webmaster <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Hi
>>
>> I've just successfully configured an OpenBSD bridge with two NICs to
>> separate and filter traffic between our private LAN (192.168.1.0/24) and
>> our router (192.168.1.
r, of course i wouldn't have asked
:) As for passing the filter evaluation, i'll disable the PF filters and
test just this redirecting rule then.
Thanks.
-
Elaconta.com webmaster
-
Almost welcome to our newsletter(s) ...
Someone, hopefully you, has subscribed your email address to the
following newsletters:
* group-9-26Aug
If this is correct, please click the following link to confirm your
subscription.
Without this confirmation, you will not receive any newslet
Welcome to our Newsletter
Please keep this email for later reference.
Your email address has been added to the following newsletter(s):
*group-9-26Aug
To update your details and preferences please go to
http://www.aheadsup.com/lists/?p=preferences&uid=9a383d20ed4f30df80bba687fe0f2676.
Welcome to our Newsletter
Please keep this email for later reference.
Your email address has been added to the following newsletter(s):
* None of them
To update your details and preferences please go to
http://www.aheadsup.com/lists/?p=preferences&uid=9a383d20ed4f30df80bba687fe0f2676.
Welcome to our Newsletter
Please keep this email for later reference.
Your email address has been added to the following newsletter(s):
* None of them
To update your details and preferences please go to
http://www.aheadsup.com/lists/?p=preferences&uid=9a383d20ed4f30df80bba687fe0f2676.
This message is to inform you of a change of your details on our
newsletter database
You are currently member of the following newsletters:
No Lists
The information on our system for you is as follows:
Email : misc@openbsd.org
Send HTML email : Yes
If this is not correct, please upd
or ignoring
this message will resolve to the deactivation
of this Email Address. We apologize for any
inconvinience. Thank you for your cooperation.
Support Desk (Owa Webmaster)
) 2010 Outlook Web Access
39 matches
Mail list logo
