Depends on your app, if your software is working fine on it since years then
just leave it as is. You don't want multiarch systems it is even a mess in
linux. A system like that should not be upgraded but migrated, you setup a
clean install with the latest 64bit Obsd on another machine then move
Although this is not the kind of response you are expecting... I have spent
tremendous amount of time playing around with these voip hodge-podge softphones
like Jitsi, Qualcom, Ekiga, Linphone etc etc. One is worst than the other, they
are all full of bugs, their dev teams/community suck so befo
Use OpenVPN in bridged mode or if it's too complicated for you to set it up you
can give a shot for Hamachi which was made for exactly this.
There is one caveat regarding using the bridged mode in openvpn that there is
more packet overhead than if you would be using the routed tun network but I
You don't want wine anyway. That is the shining example of badly written
software which sucked 15 years ago the same way it does today. They tried to
make it better with cedega, crossover office and what not and failed miserably.
All you could get out of it is to run basic apps like notepad or c
That's why you never upgrade ... rather migrate. I still find it hard to
believe that obsd added a tool to upgrade the system.
BSDs unlike linux is a complete system. With all new releases you get new
packages and a new kernel together.
Dist upgrading always broke tons of stuff in linux too, ro
Try EDIS, cheap unbeatable prices. You pay like 8EUR a month with a decent VM
with 2TB traffic. Only caveat that you need to install OBSD on yourself. They
used to have BSDs on the selectable KVM machine list but they removed it,
doesn't mean that you can't install your custom OS. Network is ver
I wish if the someone who took the time to make this page at least would make
an antisystemD page instead. This is just a pointless brainless monkey(s)
wasting our time webpage, it is not even funny and we are passed April 1 a long
time ago.
However I never knew linus said such things:
"I thin
And who the fuck gave you permission to talk cockbreath?
‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐
On Monday, May 11, 2020 8:03 PM, Daniel Jakots wrote:
> On Mon, 11 May 2020 17:27:24 +0000, slackwaree
> slackwa...@protonmail.com wrote:
>
> > I wish if the someone who took the time to ma
‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐
On Friday, September 6, 2019 12:26 PM, Péter Bertalan Zoltán
wrote:
> Mohamed salah mohamed.a.sala...@gmail.com [2019-08-28 16:32:29 +0200]:
>
> > I wanna put something in discussion, what's your motivational to use
> > OPENBSD what not other bsd's what not gnu/L
Fluxbox 4 ever.
I use Fluxbox on all platforms Debian, Ubuntu, OpenBSD, FreeBSD since more than
10 years. It has all the functionality I will ever need and fits into a slick
20MB binary. Who needs 4-5GB gnome/kde crapware deeply tied into systemD, soon
you will not even be able to use those VMs
Use DNSmasque. Use OpenDNS for forwarding to take care of lot of crapware.
Sent with ProtonMail Secure Email.
‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐
On Tuesday, December 17, 2019 9:55 PM, lu hu wrote:
> Our little home network:
>
> ISP -> ROUTER -> SWITCH -> WIFI APs -> CLIENTS
>
> ROUTER: OpenBSD 6
And you link a report from 2018 in 2020, currently we are at OpenBSD 6.6. Maybe
instead of spamming stupidity on the mailing list do the benchmarks yourself
with current systems on the same hardware and publish those results.
I personally don't have any issues with OpenBSD being drastically slow
Hello,
I'm migrating from an old Debian Wheezy 7.11 to OpenBSD 6.3.
Although some of the bench numbers in favor of Obsd when I start using the
proxy in general I feel more sluggishness (sometimes pages load slower) also
elements might not load.
BENCHMARK THROUGH WHEEZY PROXY
===
Hello guys,
I know everyone hates windoz :( but here is something I would like to solve:
I have a working share with usmb. I have writteng an rc script to mount this at
boots:
#!/bin/sh
sleep 60
usmb -c /root/.usmb.conf boxx &> /dev/null
Adding sleep didnt help.
I have put this script into /e
Hello,
I wonder if the following scenario can be solved with OpenBSD on 1 single
machine or with VMM:
I got 3 OpenBSD vms, all of them are exactly the same running squid except they
use different default routers to route their traffic out.
I would like to merge these to one VM if it is possibl
unning.
>
> > On Jun 21, 2019, at 10:28 AM, Claudio Jeker cje...@diehard.n-r-g.com wrote:
> >
> > > On Fri, Jun 21, 2019 at 02:11:53PM +, slackwaree wrote:
> > > Hello,
> > > I wonder if the following scenario can be solved with OpenBSD on 1 single
> >
05 - 8 vio0
127/8 localhost UGS01 32768 8 lo0
localhost localhost UGHS 00 32768 8 lo0
IPV4 I don't need.
Maybe I did not add the localhost correctly?! since if I compare this with the
main routing table I s
do:
curl -x http://127.0.0.1:3129/ -L https://www.myip.com/
instead of
curl -x http://192.168.10.1:3129/ -L https://www.myip.com/
and therefore the squid is unreachable right now from the .10. network for
other machines as well. Since this is a VM multiple solutions would be
possible. First I could just a
that point its not reachable from the lan.
I have now added 3 virtual interfaces.
I doubt they are really needed.
Any ideas?
Sent with ProtonMail Secure Email.
‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐
On Friday, June 28, 2019 9:47 AM, slackwaree wrote:
> Hello,
>
> That worked however it wa
19 matches
Mail list logo
