]
Are you maybe running out of memory? Is your swap partition big enough?
CU, Sico.
--
>>> ksh: cannot fork - try again
>>
>>[rest deleted for brevity]
>>
>>Are you maybe running out of memory? Is your swap partition big enough?
>>
>>CU, Sico.
>>
>>--
>>
>
> i have 730MB of 1GB available and that likely answers yo
damage. ;-)
> Thank you for sharing your thoughts.
>
> Cheers,
> STEFAN
CU, Sico.
--
You should have called my reply off-topic, I might have agreed and
said sorry for it. ;-)
[rest deleted for brevity]
CU, Sico.
--
ge' is what I intentionally try to achieve :-) (see the
> reply to myself a few minutes ago)
Uhm, squid only filters incoming traffice...
> May I ask a follow-up question: Did you set up the blacklist within
> squid.conf or did you reference to a separate file?
A bit of both really,
. All are invited
>>to join me in a nice hot cup of STFU.
>
> Subscribed to show my appreciation ...
> Thanks for the roflcopters.
> Now to unsubscribe.
Don't unsubscribe from the list, just killfile the thread. ;-)
> Best wishes.
CU, Sico.
--
ed to combine VLAN's with subnets.
On the 192.168.111.0/24 network timed worked perfectly, but it can't seem
to do the same on the 192.168.111.0/25 network I created.
I am running 4.5-stable on all my hosts.
Regards,
Sico.
--
Mbps full duplex).
How about you install 4.5 on the machine running 4.1?
CU, Sico.
--
in/config and found this
comes from sem.c but this knowledge doesn't help me all that much.
Is there a way to get a bigger process table?
Regards,
Sico.
--
On Wed, Dec 03, 2008 at 12:06:14PM +0100, Otto Moerbeek wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 03, 2008 at 11:57:32AM +0100, Sico Bruins wrote:
>
>> On one of my PCs I ran into the process table full / cannot fork
>> trouble, so I decided to make a single change in the GENERIC
>> kernel
On Wed, Dec 03, 2008 at 12:42:42PM +0100, Otto Moerbeek wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 03, 2008 at 12:36:49PM +0100, Sico Bruins wrote:
>
>> On Wed, Dec 03, 2008 at 12:06:14PM +0100, Otto Moerbeek wrote:
>>
>>> On Wed, Dec 03, 2008 at 11:57:32AM +0100, Sico Bruins wrote:
>&
w 100),
maybe something like 80 would be good. ;-)
Bye bye, and thanks for all the fish!
> -Otto
CU, Sico.
--
12 matches
Mail list logo