Re: OS X 10.11 'El Capitan' IKEv2

2015-10-02 Thread matthew j weaver
> On Aug 17, 2015, at 5:39 AM, Reyk Floeter wrote: > > On Sun, Aug 16, 2015 at 11:28:24PM +0300, Or Elimelech wrote: >> Hello misc, >> >> Has anyone connected successfully between the new OS X ikev2 impl. >> To an OpenBSD box? >> > > No, we don't have the beta. > > Reyk I’ve put some hours

Re: OS X 10.11 'El Capitan' IKEv2

2015-10-07 Thread matthew j weaver
> On Oct 3, 2015, at 5:32 AM, Reyk Floeter wrote: > In summary, the GUI part is very easy but certificate configuration is > a bit difficult. It's the same complexity as in Windows. But much > better compared to earlier IPsec configurations. Agreed, thanks for the update. I made some time to

Re: OS X 10.11 'El Capitan' IKEv2

2015-10-15 Thread matthew j weaver
> On 2015-10-03, at 0040h, matthew j weaver wrote: > > I’ve not yet surfaced where the ikev2 proposal/policy configs hide in OS X. For anyone still playing the home game: You’ll find the proposal configs for both phases of your VPN interface hiding in /Library/Pr

vmm(4)/vmd(8) trouble: vmd exits with proc_dispatch msgbuf_write error

2022-12-14 Thread matthew j weaver
Howdy, all. I'm at my wit's end and am hoping somebody can spot what I'm overlooking. I cannot get vmd to run on some hardware which seems like it should support virtualization. CPU is an Intel(R) Core(TM) i5-7200U (full dmesg is below my message). sietchtabr# dmesg|grep vmm cpu0: using VERW MDS

Re: vmm(4)/vmd(8) trouble: vmd exits with proc_dispatch msgbuf_write error

2022-12-14 Thread matthew j weaver
Ah, because _rtadvd already held GID 92 so my sysmerge after the sysupgrade to 7.2 partially failed -- and I ignored it. Thank you, Theo, I appreciate the assist. It does feel like a pretty hostile failure mode. weaver On Wed, Dec 14, 2022, at 13:48, Theo de Raadt wrote: >> vmd: getgrnam >> p

Re: Problem with WireGuard on OpenBSD 7.3

2023-05-04 Thread matthew j weaver
On Thu, May 4, 2023, at 08:06, Odd Martin Baanrud wrote: > https://ianix.com/wireguard/openbsd-howto.html This tutorial has one installing a port ("wireguard-tools"), and then making one's wireguard interface depend on that package. I am not sure why it does that, but that one problem with you

Re: ixl(4) troubles

2024-10-04 Thread matthew j weaver
t 03, 2024 at 01:52:11PM -0500, matthew j weaver wrote: >>> Howdy, all. I'm having basic trouble with some ixl(4) interfaces and >>> cannot figure out what I am overlooking. >>> >>> The hardware is an Intel X710 SFP+ card with two interfaces. I cannot >

ixl(4) troubles

2024-10-03 Thread matthew j weaver
Howdy, all. I'm having basic trouble with some ixl(4) interfaces and cannot figure out what I am overlooking. The hardware is an Intel X710 SFP+ card with two interfaces. I cannot seem to get the interfaces to achieve carrier link. The interfaces are always status: no carrier. I've tried a few tra

Re: ixl(4) troubles

2024-10-05 Thread matthew j weaver
hew, > > We are using multiple ixl(4) quad cards and encountered the same issue when > testing with 3rd party optics. > Using official intel optics or re-branded optics works ok for us on openbsd > 7.4. > > Kind regards, > Wouter > > On Fri, Oct 4, 2024 at 12:27 PM m

Re: ixl(4) troubles

2024-10-05 Thread matthew j weaver
Yes, the firmware was ancient! You'll notice the later boots included in my dmesg show the interfaces with the latest firmware: ixl0 at pci1 dev 0 function 0 "Intel X710 SFP+" rev 0x02: port 0, FW 9.152.77998 API 1.15, msix, 8 queues, address 40:a6:b7:b3:4b:28 ixl1 at pci1 dev 0 function 1 "Intel