Hi!
Currently using 5.5-stable and It seems (as per hwfeatures) that driver for BCM
5709 (1GE dual port adapter)
doesnt support jumbo frames at all which is critical for activation mpls on bnx.
The card supports jumbo itself.
Return invalid argument when trying to setup jumbo via ifconfig.
is th
:43:30 +0400, def написал:
> ok doing 'make' for bnx mtu right now.
> I knew that its configurable via rebuild, but if standard max value was not
> set by 5.5, does it mean that it can be turn on safely for kernel or for hw
> tx/rx rings, memory pages, etc..?
>
> I h
i can try 57711 a
little.
As i understood it will be done in 5.6 as stable driver?
Птн 25 Июл 2014 10:53:34 +0400, David Gwynne написал:
> On 24 Jul 2014, at 19:37, def wrote:
>
> > Hi!
> >
> > Currently using 5.5-stable and It seems (as per hwfeatures) that driver for
&
(seems that REQ transmition failed by bnx).
So i can only setup the interface as static IP, but even ARP (mac address) not
resolved
for directly connected hosts.
Rolled back to original if_bnx.
> Сбт 26 Июл 2014 11:27:41 +0400, def написал:
> > Change in max_std_mtu of if_bnxreg to
Hi,
is any information to further driver support of that card?
Cant find chipset specification, seems its manufactured for IBM specially.
Also i dont see any Brocade adapters in man pages of 5.5.
Hi!
Say, i have set three jobs with the same -t time in format yymmddHHMM.
# at -l
1406718000.cWed Jul 30 15:00:00 2014
1406718001.cWed Jul 30 15:00:01 2014
1406718002.cWed Jul 30 15:00:02 2014
Q1: Why jobs a shifted by 1 second from each other? ID is set to be unique -
OK,
but why
Yes, exactly, i mean 1010/1020.
Thank you much!
FromJonathan Gray
Subject Re: Brocade 10Gb CNA for IBM System X
DateTue, 29 Jul 2014 22:51:37 +1000
[Part 1 text/plain us-ascii (0.5 kilobytes)] (View Text in a separate window)
On Tue, Jul 29, 2014 at 04:13:16PM +0400, def wrote:
>
Hi,
I guess that it is a problem.
All the times i saw bad checksum in tcpdump it was a problems with packet
delivery via that interface, it is ok, as checksum need to be correct.
There are some checksum changes in ipv6 since 5.4, so it may be some new bug
you was discovered.
I cant test neighbo
Im widely using l3vpn with obsd including native bgpd for vpnv4 SAFI and
rdomains far from obsd 4.8, so it is about 3 years.And im crying still... :)
note: i am not using ldpd yet, i prefered bgp vpnv4 for labels.
First, tnx to
claudio with 5.2, vpnv4 RD is no longer compared while prefix import t
one more
6. has two peers with different ASthere is filter on second peer that
deny large portion of prefixesthe case:at initial state just after both
sessions are UP i have full table from peer2 ~110k prefixesreal prefix number
after filter applied ~ 23khow i see the peer with bgpctl
40 mins # bg
eer (after deny filter applied) the counter becomes
2^32 and starts decrement again over and over.
The real rib still contains the good prefixes and they are work.
something like cosmetic bug.
Втр 04 Фев 2014 17:54:50 +0400, Gregor Best написал:
> On Tue, Feb 04, 2014 at 02:31:37P
11 matches
Mail list logo
