It's not a bridge because i can SSH to any of the IPs of the Linux box
(192.168.1.121 ou 192.168.1.122) from the local network (and only one of
the NICs in the box is directly connected no the LAN). From what i know,
bridges have no IP addresses. Or am i wrong?
--
Elaconta.
If i set one of the NICs to a 255.255.255.255 netmask (i know it's a
"cheat"), say the one that connects to the 192.168.1.0 LAN, won't it
be able to connect to the LAN that way?
Also, what if i add an alias to the second NIC the the box and do
something like:
192.168.1.120 (Router)
|
192.168.1.12
I'm not looking forward to addressing the router to a different subnet
(and i know that would solve the problem) because our Internet-facing
servers are connected directly to that router in DMZ fashion (the router
forwards ports to them). The firewall is also connected directly to that
router and t
3 matches
Mail list logo
