removal code in place...
so more memory used but then interactive commands cannot tax the box
too much when asking what are all the blackhole routes, reject routes
host routes / arp entries ?
Thanks
Tom Smyth
On Tue, 25 Jun 2024 at 10:00, Claudio Jeker wrote:
>
> On Tue, Jun 25, 2024 at
?
Any thoughts / feedback welcome
Thanks
Tom Smyth
On Sun, 15 Mar 2020 at 15:26, Maurice McCarthy wrote:
>
> There is a discussion about sofdeps here
> http://openbsd-archive.7691.n7.nabble.com/What-are-the-disadvantages-of-soft-updates-td264283.html
>
--
Kindest regards,
Tom Smyth.
etc .
>
> > ###
> > This seems to solve problems with upgrades and package updates,
basically if the partition was not synced with a copy on shutdown you
would lose the updated files ...
>
> What problem?
>
> Jan
>
--
Kindest regards,
Tom Smyth.
Hi Kirill,
Ill give sync a go ... and see how it impacts performance...
thanks for the suggestion,
On Wed, 10 Jul 2024 at 16:30, Kirill A. Korinsky wrote:
>
> On Wed, 10 Jul 2024 14:44:28 +0100,
> Tom Smyth wrote:
> >
> > #cat /etc/fstab
> >
> > ff0023511d131f
mfs (asynchronous, local, noexec, nosuid,
size=32768 512-blocks)
Thanks again
On Wed, 10 Jul 2024 at 17:07, Tom Smyth wrote:
>
> Hi Kirill,
> Ill give sync a go ... and see how it impacts performance...
> thanks for the suggestion,
>
> On Wed, 10 Jul 2024 at 16:30, Kirill
sue (in my deployment scenario)
Thanks
Tom Smyth
On Wed, 10 Jul 2024 at 18:39, Kirill A. Korinsky wrote:
>
> On Wed, 10 Jul 2024 17:40:17 +0100,
> Tom Smyth wrote:
> >
> > swap /tmp mfs rw,nosuid,noexec,nodev,-s=262144 0 0
> > swap /var/log mfs rw,nosuid,noexec,nodev,-s=
Hi Stuart I heard that no swap stops dumps in the event of a panic
On Wed, 10 Jul 2024 at 21:46, Stuart Henderson
wrote:
>
> On 2024-07-10, Tom Smyth wrote:
> > I don't include a swap partition on the routers in the field as I
> > don't want them swapping to disk,
669180 - 3 em1
> 104.167.241.2108a:2c:1c:4a:15:f4 UHLc 0 1412439 - 3 em1
> 104.167.241.21100:25:90:5a:2d:92 UHLl 0 766416 - 1 em1
> 104.167.241.255104.167.241.211UHb0 449707 - 1 em1
> 127/8 127.0.0.1 UGRS 00 32768 8 lo0
> 127.0.0.1 127.0.0.1 UHhl 2 1707666 32768 1 lo0
>
> --
> jrmu
> IRCNow (https://ircnow.org)
>
--
Kindest regards,
Tom Smyth.
Hi Jan sorry for the late reply,
Thanks for your comments and questions ,
Replies are in line
On Wed, 17 Jul 2024 at 13:12, Jan Stary wrote:
>
> On Jul 10 17:05:55, tom.sm...@wirelessconnect.eu wrote:
> > Hi Jan
> > thanks for your Reply and feedback,
> > please find my replies in line ,
> >
>
erformance is not brilliant , so I'm hopping
there is a kernel driver device that would allow
I was wondering if anyone else ran into this issue and resolved it
with an existing device driver in OpenBSD...
Thanks
--
Kindest regards,
Tom Smyth.
Jeker wrote:
>
> On Tue, Jul 23, 2024 at 08:51:19AM +0100, Tom Smyth wrote:
> > Folks,
> >
> > As an ISP we often have to manage wans for customers where we don't
> > have access to customers firewalls, and the customers expect full
> > sized frames / packets
...
Thanks again
Tom Smyth.
irq 12
pckbd0 at pckbc0 (kbd slot)
wskbd0 at pckbd0 mux 1
pms0 at pckbc0 (aux slot)
wsmouse0 at pms0 mux 0
pcppi0 at isa0 port 0x61
spkr0 at pcppi0
vmm0 at mainbus0: VMX/EPT (using slow L1TF mitigation)
uhidev0 at uhub1 port 1 configuration 1 interface 0 "QEMU QEMU USB Tablet"
rev 2.00/0.00 addr 2
uhidev0: iclass 3/0
ums0 at uhidev0: 3 buttons, Z dir
wsmouse1 at ums0 mux 0
vscsi0 at root
scsibus3 at vscsi0: 256 targets
softraid0 at root
scsibus4 at softraid0: 256 targets
root on sd0a (f6d6d0484f41c115.a) swap on sd0b dump on sd0b
--
Kindest regards,
Tom Smyth.
--
Kindest regards,
Tom Smyth.
submitted comprehensive bug reports
and or fixes and Pull requests ... it is really appreciated...
If you have encountered a problem in nsh recently we would like to tackle
it in the upcoming release
Thanks again
Tom Smyth.
32 0 2529286504
> 98156 0
> vlan0 150004:3f:72:b8:bf:0a 2324523408 0 994911784
> 3752 0
> vlan0 1500 10.90/1610.90.0.102324523408 0 994911784
> 3752 0
> vlan1 150040:a6:b7:3d:ac:60 1725034503 0 1757650331
> 92484 0
> vlan1 1500 10.1/16 10.1.0.2501725034503 0 1757650331
> 92484 0
> vlan10 1500bc:97:e1:d8:55:b0 841039615 0 1905162366
> 31036 0
>
>
> Thanks for your help.
> Marc
>
>
>
--
Kindest regards,
Tom Smyth.
an ip address on and route over
,
any pointers would be really appreciated
thanks
Tom Smyth
--
Kindest regards,
Tom Smyth.
priority 0 llprio 3
groups: sec
inet 172.16.1.2 --> 172.16.1.1 netmask 0x
It works ok .. . feels a little magic :)
thanks for wrtiting the sec(4) driver and the integration with iked... ipsec
Much obliged...
Tom Smyth
On Tue, 19 Nov 2024 at 12:04, David Gwynne wrote:
gt; > On 20 Nov 2024, at 11:15, Tom Smyth wrote:
> >
> > Hi Folks,
> > Thanks for the suggestions... also I have run policy based ipsec
> > between fortniet and openbsd and it seemed to work well...
> > we just want to run dynamic routing so it is easier have tu
401 - 418 of 418 matches
Mail list logo
