10Gbit network work only 1Gbit

t? I know it's so difficult to make a mistake from some information, what should we look at? -- Üdvözlettel, Szél Gábor WanTax Kft. tel.: +36 20 3838 171 fax: +36 82 357 585 email: gabor.s...@wantax.hu web: http://wantax.hu web: http://halozatom.hu

Re: 10Gbit network work only 1Gbit

trunk interface with aggr - remove bridge interface if there was an update finised, I'll write again! -- Regars Szél Gábor WanTax Kft. tel.: +36 20 3838 171 fax: +36 82 357 585 email: gabor.s...@wantax.hu web: http://wantax.hu web: http://halozatom.hu 2019. 11. 11. 23:42 keltezés

Re: 10Gbit network work only 1Gbit

not permanently We reinstall backup firewall oBSD 6.6, and make some test. Thx your reply! -- Üdvözlettel, Szél Gábor WanTax Kft. tel.: +36 20 3838 171 fax: +36 82 357 585 email: gabor.s...@wantax.hu web: http://wantax.hu web: http://halozatom.hu 2019. 11. 12. 20:46 keltezéssel

aggr vs Nexus 3K

eful-convergence". still not working, if i removed aggr interface, and make new trunk interface with LACP, it works great. I dont know whats wrong :( Anyone have any ideas? -- Üdvözlettel, Szél Gábor WanTax Kft. tel.: +36 20 3838 171 fax: +36 82 357 585 email: gabor.s...@wanta

Re: SPAM: Re: aggr vs Nexus 3K

Yes of course! :) if aggr up, Nexus suspend port channel: "not receiving any LACP BPDUs  suspending" If trunk up, nexus not suspend port channel. -- Üdvözlettel, Szél Gábor WanTax Kft. tel.: +36 20 3838 171 fax: +36 82 357 585 email: gabor.s...@wantax.hu web: http://wan

Re: aggr vs Nexus 3K

; up LACP trunk is working! but interesting! hostname.trunk* is working without up! :) -- Üdvözlettel, Szél Gábor WanTax Kft. tel.: +36 20 3838 171 fax: +36 82 357 585 email: gabor.s...@wantax.hu web: http://wantax.hu web: http://halozatom.hu 2019. 11. 14. 17:45 keltezéssel, Szél

PPTP NAT passthrough

n But I don't know what to use. -- Üdvözlettel, Szél Gábor WanTax Kft. tel.: +36 20 3838 171 fax: +36 82 357 585 email: gabor.s...@wantax.hu web: http://wantax.hu web: http://halozatom.hu

PF divert-packet reinjection

n is the same! I see the packet in example log, and SSH connection is successfully. I think PF divert-packet does not reinject packets to PF. Is there a solution for this? -- Üdvözlettel, Szél Gábor WanTax Kft. tel.: +36 20 3838 171 fax: +36 82 357 585 email: gabor.s...@wantax.hu w

aggr+vlan lost packets

 switchport nonegotiate  channel-group 1 mode active -- Üdvözlettel, Szél Gábor WanTax Kft. tel.: +36 20 3838 171 fax: +36 82 357 585 email: gabor.s...@wantax.hu web: http://wantax.hu web: http://halozatom.hu

Re: aggr+vlan lost packets

before reinstall this server, on oBSD 6.1, LACP + 82571EB is working correctly. we have many-many OpenBSD (router, firewall) installations, but we have not yet experienced this problem. If possible, we use intel network cards. -- Üdvözlettel, Szél Gábor WanTax Kft. tel.: +36 20

ixl driver very poor network performance

Dear @misc! We have several more complex networks where openbsd is the router. Structure of the network: * OpenBSD redundant routers - two OpenBSD - CARP - pfsync - LACP trunks for LAN (2x 10Gbit)  (1 side switch #1, 2 side switch #2 + VPC )  use OpenBSD aggr device * Cisco Nex

WAB veb vs PF NAT

Dear @misc We want to implement a transparent router. We have some different public subnets ( /27, /28). All public subnet comes in on one interface - "WAN". We want to "forward" incoming traffic to an internal VLAN. Every device in this VLAN has a public IP address. We don't want to routing for

PF pass not working (on complex "firewall")

Dear @misc We have an stupid problem. On a complex firewall (currently PF rules 1200 row), one PASS rule not working. I do not know why. There are many VLANs, WAN, LAN interfaces, many ipsec VPNs, CARP (master-backup), pfsync, etc ... PF main rules: # set #..

Re: PF pass not working (on complex "firewall")

* to 172.20.122.0/24 \ PF rules working correctly. -- Regards Gábor Szél email:gabor.s...@wantax.hu 2022. 03. 05. 23:08 keltezéssel, Szél Gábor írta: Dear @misc We have an stupid problem. On a complex firewall (currently PF rules 1200 row), one PASS rule not working. I do not know