On Wed, 29 Sep 2010 11:57:10 +0200, you wrote:
>sigh. use-after-free (most likely, at least) somewhere. unlikely to be
>carp itself. might be re (wild guess).
I think your "somewhere near re" theory might have some merrit to it. :)
I've had a number of crashes over the past couple days, but this
On Sun, 3 Oct 2010 22:41:50 +0200, you wrote:
>err... reading the trace first helps. this is actually pretty clearly a
>problem in re. I don't feel responsible for re tho :)
Is there something else I should do before submitting something to bugs?
Both of these source files haven't been modified
On Sun, 3 Oct 2010 22:24:18 +0200, you wrote:
>well, it is easy enough to verify - use something else but re. if it's
>stable, we have the guilty party, at least.
Yea, I'm sort of stuck with re. Here's a few quick images of these boxes. It's
a
Jetway NF76 board with a daughter card with 3 RTL8110
Could this be indicative of something with my problem?
I can't seem to list a "re" interface with ifconfig.
# uptime
8:51PM up 1 day, 8:09, 1 user, load averages: 0.12, 0.09, 0.08
# ifconfig
lo0: flags=8049 mtu 33200
priority: 0
groups: lo
inet 127.0.0.1 netmask 0xff000
4 matches
Mail list logo
