Martin wrote:
Can (or does) spamd look at the From:, do a MX/A record dns lookup and
compare. it to the sender IP to see if it's valid during the SMTP
transaction ?
Assuming you're talking about spamd in greylisting mode, here's your
answer from spamd (8): spamd will use the db file in /va
I just sent a $100 donation via the orders page, for itanium...or whatever.
Paul de Weerd wrote:
On Fri, Jun 08, 2007 at 12:42:15PM -0600, Diana Eichert wrote:
| On Fri, 8 Jun 2007, Theo de Raadt wrote:
|
| >>anybody showed interest in suporting your Itanium request?
| >
| >From what I know, I t
On Jul 9, 2008, at 4:53 AM, Rod Whitworth wrote:
# tcpdump -nettti rl0 dst port 53
tcpdump: listening on rl0, link-type EN10MB
Jul 09 19:48:27.786683 00:01:80:0f:2b:94 00:00:24:c6:18:85 0800 70:
192.168.80.4.16284 > 192.168.80.1.53: 57120+ A? pps.com.au. (28)
Jul 09 19:48:43.690332 00:01:80:0f:
On Jul 9, 2008, at 12:19 PM, Ted Unangst wrote:
n front). something like,
nat on egress proto udp from (self) to any port 53 -> (self)
I don't think this actually accomplishes much. It still lets poisoned
replies back in on the previous port number.
But does it allow a poisoned reply from
On Sep 21, 2006, at 8:41 AM, Peter wrote:
I have seen on two sites a guy complaining about the CD ordering
system. Apparently there is no mention of the amount you will
actually
be paying unless you provide your CC info. This may detract some
potential buyers.
Huh? The prices are right t
On Sep 21, 2006, at 2:12 PM, Martin Schrvder wrote:
2006/9/21, L. V. Lammert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Nope, totals are right at the top of the page.
+ Shipping.
When am I told, how much shipping will cost? At least not before I
submit my credit card info.
When it ships, because you are charged
On Sep 27, 2006, at 6:10 PM, Rickard Borgmdster wrote:
What I see as the problem here, is that the "blacklisting" occurs
before
the whitelisting. So that, when a large block such as 31.32.33.0/24 is
in and I wish to whitelist 31.32.33.188, that whitelist entry
will have no effect.
This is
On Sep 28, 2006, at 1:39 AM, Rickard Borgmdster wrote:
If that is the case, it's terrific :-) But it still doesn't take
care of
the "fastlane", so that whitelisted host doesn't have to go trough the
greylist process. Or does it?
That's because the "fastlane" is a separate issue. If you wa
On Oct 20, 2006, at 8:42 AM, Will H. Backman wrote:
Steve Williams wrote:
Bob, if you are listening, what do you do at the U of A to handle
these mis-behaving server pools? Anyone else??
I have been running spamd for several years now, and have found that
it works quite well for my comp
On Nov 11, 2006, at 10:47 AM, Federico Giannici wrote:
No, I'm SURE I executed ALL of them, including "make includes"!
In fact, it is in the steps I wrote.
And I repeated it a couple of times.
There must be something else wrong...
I happened to have a freshly-upgraded 4.0 box on hand here,
On Sat, 11 Jun 2005, Frank Bax ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
I've been getting this error message since midnight...
# /usr/libexec/spamd-setup -d
blacklist myblack 2 entries
whitelist mywhite 69 entries
Getting http://www.openbsd.org/spamd/SBL.cidr.gz
spamd-setup: Could not add blacklist spamhaus:
FEATURE(`dnsbl',`relays.ordb.org', `Rejected - see http://ordb.org/')dnl
FEATURE(`dnsbl',`sbl-xbl.spamhaus.org',`Rejected - see
http://spamhaus.org/')dnl
Jun 17 19:49:29 inetmail sendmail[13126]: ruleset=check_relay,
arg1=[210.213.176.247], arg2=127.0.0.4, relay=210.213.176.247.pldt.net
[210.
Because those addresses are in the XBL, not the SBL. The XBL is
populated by entries from the CBL, which are added when virus-like or
worm-like behavior is detected, and entries are removed at the first
request. Doesn't really make a whole lot of sense to try to create a
static list for it, when
Thanks for your help Steve, I think Otto is looking at the *real* problem.
You clearly don't understand the real problem. The SBL and XBL are two
different lists. Your spamd configuration uses the SBL, and tarpits all
hosts that appear on it. Your sendmail configuration uses both the SBL
a
On Tue, 21 Jun 2005, Heinrich Rebehn ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
Would it be possible to change this behaviour so that the whitelisting is
done as soon as the same sender/receiver pair is seen again, ignoring the
ip address? This could speed up things a bit.
Here is why that idea won't work,
anyone know what happened to the w32codecs in the ports tree?
I'm using 3.7-STABLE and see this:
cirque$ cd ./graphics/win32-codecs
cirque$ sudo make
Password:
===> Checking files for win32-codecs-20050216
all-20050216.tar.bz2 doesn't seem to exist on this system.
Looks like the port needs t
On Wed, 29 Jun 2005, Roy Morris ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
Anyone used spamd greylisting with postfix? I
was on the greylisting site and postfix but didn't
see any configuration examples.
It's no different than using spamd with sendmail. Once spamd has
whitelisted the IP, email is delivered
Bryan Brake wrote:
I am taking an "Intro to UNIX" class at school. The teacher has asked
that we send him a copy of our .history files to show what steps we used
to complete certain assignments. I was able to setup the history in my
.profile by reading ksh(1), but after I rebooted and issued a
James Mackinnon wrote:
If you do offer paypal for the stuff above, I will buy more frequently
as to do my part to help support the System I trust with my
systems/network security.
I will send a donation now as well as I can do that VIA paypal (won't be
large, but it will be a donation)
It'
On Sun, 23 Oct 2005, Monah Baki ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
Hi all,
Until 4 days ago, I no longer receive email on my server. I thought it was my
provider (cox) since they
block inbound and outbound smtp.
If I telnet from the outside to my server on port 110 & 143,
110 and 143 are POP and IM
On Sun, 26 Feb 2006, Edd Barrett ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
Whilst browsing fosdem 2004 pics, I saw a t-shirt I like.
http://saad.docisland.org/pictures/fosdem2004/files/page11-1008-full.html
(far left. Dark with small blue puffy logo)
Where can you get this tee? It doesnt appear to be on the
21 matches
Mail list logo
